Should President Bush be impeached yes/no?

Question

The congress is debatting whether or not they are going to impeach President Bush for the handling of the Iraq war and other consequences of his years in office. What do you think, should they or shouldn't they?

The law that has been brocken was following you Dumb fort!

He went against a country, claiming it had weapon of massdestructions.
But when entering Iraq those who were on the comittee, did not found any evidence of such.

Hence, committing act against Diplomacy of a foreigh country is enough against a law that he could get impeached for.

Hence, this is why Europeans try it with Diplomacy, rather with dictatorship like President Bush did.

Hence, dumb say to say that I am against your Freedom. I am not against that, but I stand against Political assholes, that take advantage of power and form it to their needs! No one should over estimate their power!

Answer 1

Yes, they should.

Answer 2

For what? First, the only people tailking about his impeachment in Congress is a disgruntled outgoing congresswomen. The Iraq war is a legal war approved by Congress. Us along with other countries used the best information we had in going to war. Saddam violated countless treaties that he himself agreed to after the first Iraq war. If he would have allowed us in to inspect his facilities, per these treaties and UN resolutions, the dictator would still be in power.

Now instead of terriosts atacking American civilians here they are able to attack American troops in Irag and Afgahnistan. As bad as it is to see an American soldier die I would rather that than an innocent person on their way to work. We are at war with Islamic extremists and I would rather fight that war in the Middle East than on American soil.

As far as other laws he broke I am not sure what you speak of.

Perhaps it is his so called "illeagel" wire tapping program. The Bill passed by Congress including a vast majority of Democrats. This bill expires every three years and must be renewed by Congress. Even after this story "broke" and countless Democrats came out oposing the Bill, when it came time to renew a vast majority of Congress including most Democrats voted to renew the Bill. So are they for it or against it? Looks like John Kerry politics hard at work.

Or perhaps you speak of President Bush suspending Habeas Corpus. Something that every President has done during a time of war to protect American citizens from its enemies. Most notably Abraham Lincoln during the Civil War.

Or perhaps it is that you simply disagree with his policies, and instead of voting him out of office, which could not be done, you get desperate and speak of impeachment.

Many liberals bring up the subject of a Bush impeachment, but give no legimate reason to do so. Democrats have no original ideas. The Democratic agenda has nothing on it except to be against everything Bush does. What will happen when Bush is out of office? What will your policies be then?

Answer 3

No he should not impeached. The bill was authored by Cynthia McKinney, the biggest fruitcake in Congress, who is on her way out after failing to win re-election. This is the woman who physically attacked the Capitol Hill police. The President has broken no laws, you can't impeach someone just for disagreeing with him/her. It's just a big waste of time and tax payers dollars.

Answer 4

All the Bush haters can claim he broke laws all they want to, but the fact is he didn't break any laws.
Many people actually agree with the Presidents policies. I guess in the Bush haters eyes that makes them all criminals. The President didn't lie to the American people or Congress. The Patriot act was made into a law, so it did not break any laws. Just not liking The Presidents policies does not make them criminal. Thank God Pelosi recognizes this.

Answer 5

No. The president has broken no laws, unlike President Clinton. Also, you have to understand that President Bush gave Saddam two days to get out of Iraq. That was plenty of time for Saddam to smuggle the WMD's out of Iraq and into another country.

Answer 6

And the right-wingers jumped to the defense of "W" on this one didn't they? Yes, Bush should be impeached for his actions in office. He lied plain and simple. That fact alone should be enough to get the ball rolling.You can debate the technical aspects all you want but I was brought up to believe a lie was a lie...no if, ands, or buts. All I can say is "when Clinton lied, nobody died".

Answer 7

Before you ask whether the president should be impeached you should be able to quote the text of the law that was broken.

If you cannot quote the text of the law that was violated then you have just become a danger to our Constitution and our freedoms.

Answer 8

No, he is our president, despite what people think of him, it is the people who put them there. The people who hate Bush or are angry by the voters decisions, probably didn't vote in the first place and should stop complaining because they have no right to. Also, I think people forget, it was Congress who put us in the Iraqi War, not Bush.
Before anyone accuses me or starts getting heated, I'm a registered Democrat...and yes...I did vote last election. ^_^

Answer 9

Yes. He should also be sent to the Hague for trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity, by starting an illegal war, bombing a civilian population, and murdering (as it's not war) - or at least being responsible for the deaths of thousands of people. Whether it was approved by congress (after congress was lied to) is irrelevant, because it's still illegal under international law. The Bosnian genocide was legal under yugoslavian law, yet that doesn't stop Milosevic being a war criminal. However - fat chance of him EVER facing up to his crimes.

Answer 10

Absolutely not. Do you really want Cheney as President?

Answer 11

N O!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1