English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why you never see attorneys and councils appearing in the courtroom on shows like JUDGE JUDY, JUDGE JOE BROWN, JUDGE MATHIS, JUDGE HATCHETT, THE PEOPLE'S COURT, etc?

2006-12-11 08:44:51 · 12 answers · asked by big_bubba_1985 2 in Entertainment & Music Television

12 answers

its small claims court. you represent yourself

2006-12-11 08:52:49 · answer #1 · answered by be calm 3 · 0 0

You can represent yourself in any court, even the US Supreme Court. There is no law that says you MUST have a lawyer. However, as the saying goes, if you represent yourself in court, you have a fool for a lawyer.

Small Claims court is more relaxed in terms of the rigid procedural rules that govern other types of courts. This gives an opportunity for non-lawyerly folks to present their grievance without having to study up on those process rules.

The TV shows you refer to are in a Small Claims setting, where the informality does not require a lawyer. Interestingly enough, if you do bring a lawyer to small claims - which you can do if you so choose - the judge may frown on you for that. Anywhere else, and the judge will frown on you for not having a lawyer.

In capital crimes, you would have to go through at least a psych exam before a judge would let you represent yourself - the premise being: you must be nuts to want to do that.

2006-12-11 09:03:34 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I love these court shows! The reason attorney's are usually never allowed is because these are 'civil' cases. The people represent themselves. Attorney's are not needed necessarily in civil cases unless someone 'is' an attorney and brings a case against you. The claims here are small amounts - $5000 or less. The judges figure that the people can provide their proof and any documentation that would satisfy the judge in order to hopefully, win their case.

2006-12-11 08:48:49 · answer #3 · answered by THE SINGER 7 · 0 0

The cases are from small claims court where no attorney is required.
Small claims court is very much like these shows in that both parties tell their side of the story and produce their evidence and the judge makes the decision.

2006-12-11 08:47:37 · answer #4 · answered by ©2009 7 · 0 0

Because its more fun to watch people explain things and make fools out of themselves. Those shows would fail with lawyers because they would be boring. Besides. Most small claims courts are just the witnesses, plaintiff, defendant and the judge. Its for claims under 5000 bucks. Why waste 1000's on lawyers on such small claims. That's why its on TV. Its all small claims crap. If you want to watch it in real life, go down to your local courthouse. The same crap happens everyday.

2006-12-11 08:51:03 · answer #5 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

They are small claims court. Most of the time, you can be your own lawyer to represent yourself. Sometimes, though, there have been some people who actually showed up with their lawyers, even though they did not have to. In a small claims court, it is not necessary to have a lawyer represent you-but it does help.

2006-12-11 09:12:53 · answer #6 · answered by uchaboo 6 · 0 0

Attorneys aren't allowed in small claims.

2006-12-11 10:41:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

decide Marilyn Milian from the Peoples court docket. She is unquestionably humorous and clever ; maximum of all she is conscious and could totally clarify the regulation. Many regulation scholars love observing her to overview. lots of the different judges inject too plenty of their heavy-exceeded emotional rubbish onto the litigants. even with the undeniable fact that Milian is outspoken, maximum circumstances she applies the regulation judiciously.

2016-12-30 06:53:31 · answer #8 · answered by devoss 3 · 0 0

Well, hello. Because it's small claims court.

2006-12-11 15:28:36 · answer #9 · answered by darkhunterfan65 3 · 0 0

because they are small claims court shows and you dont need attorneys etc..

2006-12-11 08:48:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

because these people have agreed to arbitration, i.e, letting a third party listen to each side and make the final decision. i belive i read somwhere they sign a binding agreement to accept the judgments a final. i think they also want to appear on TV!

2006-12-11 09:39:44 · answer #11 · answered by jeanievee@verizon.net 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers