I mean, while keeping a straight face?
2006-12-11 07:48:42 · 8 answers · asked by Nic 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I did not keep a straight face as my picture shows, you smart ***.
2006-12-11 07:53:30 · update #1
ok, Bolton is an honest man.
but here are some hints if you care to think:
- do you send a guy who hates the UN to the UN. what message does that send?
- being blunt might be very shocking in other cultures. (if you care)
- does it really help your cause to make everyone hate you?
- how many Iraq wars before you get it?
2006-12-11 08:10:48 · update #2
Sure, however it does not mean they act together. Bolton was nothing more than an attack dog for the President. Diplomacy was not his forte. I think he was put there to counter people like Chavez, show them we have crazies too.
2006-12-11 08:25:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I believe John Bolton has been the very best UN secretary in decades, and now the sleaze from the under belly of this country, the democrats think they can improve on him. I not only doubt that they can, I know they have nobody in waiting that will hold a candle to Bolton. So, once again the American people lose.
These foolish and cowardly democrats really believe they can improve the world situation with their smooth talk and diplomacy bullsh it. Think again you morons! The only thing you will buywith these pathetic tactics, is time, because the scum on the other end need it to perfect their weapons.
2006-12-11 08:01:46 · answer #2 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Replacing John Bolton and US diplomacy in the UN, the Democrats will send in a case of white flags with the next ambassador, the honorable Ben Dover, so that America will not offend any other country.
2006-12-11 07:54:29 · answer #3 · answered by tom4bucs 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you were looking at his handling of the Security Council he was top notch, there has never been a better advocate for the US. His problem with the general assembly is his inability to tolerate third world countries telling the US we don't give them enough money.
John Bolton is too honest to be a diplomat, but he is a great person to have representing your interests.
2006-12-11 07:53:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Diplomacy and John Bolton are mutually exclusive... Just as democracy and John Bolton are, too.
2006-12-11 07:59:48 · answer #5 · answered by TruthHurts 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
THE PROBLEM WITH PEOPLE LIKE BOLTON IS THEY ARE TOO HONEST....THEY SAY WHAT THEY MEAN AND MEAN WHAT THEY SAY. FOLKS THESE DAYS ARE UNCOMFORTABLE WITH THAT....THEY MUCH PREFER MEELY-MOUTHY TYPES THAT NEED THE TALKING HEADS TO TELL YOU WHAT THEY JUST SAID 5 SECONDS AGO AND WHAT THEY MEAN BY IT. PEOPLE LIKE BOLTON DONT HAVE THAT PROBLEM. RUBS FOLKS THE WRONG WAY. BUT THATS MOST PROBABLY WHAT THEY NEED AT THE U.N. NOW. SOMEBODY WHO SAYS IT LIKE IT IS NO MATTER HOW UNCONFORTABLE IT MAKES THEM....DO YA HEAR ABOUT ALL THOSE SCANDALS ANYMORE.
HELL NO!! THEY BEEN BURIED NEVER TO BE HEARD FROM AGAIN.
2006-12-11 07:59:55 · answer #6 · answered by Rich S 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You just did! Laughs on you!!!!
2006-12-11 07:53:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I tried; I couldn't do it.
2006-12-11 07:52:48 · answer #8 · answered by amg503 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋