But it is not ok for a Mother to mourn the death of her son?
2006-12-11 07:38:57 · 13 answers · asked by Sean 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Sean - she gave him up and did not have contact with him before he was killed. The rest of the family verify this. She has now, because of her insane antics, lost the respect of her other children and ex-husband.
I feel bad for her AS A MOM - my post said that. She is exploiting her boy's death and that is not good for anyone.
WHY doesn't she care about her family that is alive? Why didn't she care to see her son before he was killed?
2006-12-11 08:51:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Sheehan has destroyed her son's legacy. Her son died in the line of duty. An honorable death. Bush did not "invade" Iraq for his father. Congress approved based on intelligence from the CIA and others.
2006-12-11 15:50:27 · answer #2 · answered by only p 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
1.Clinton himself said that Sadam was a threat to the United States and that Sadam had weapons..,lets not foget he did attack Iraq.
2.Sadam was shooting at our guys in the no fly zone.
3.He continued to disregard the UN [thats United Nations]resolution.
And since when has Cindy Sheehan done anything for her dead son but spit on the job he was proud to do since he reenlisted???And what kind of so called mother gives up her husband and other children for her political publicity?She is a self centered pathetic excuse for a human being.Being a mother is more than just giving birth.
2006-12-11 15:47:29 · answer #3 · answered by halfbright 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Well, we didn't go into Iraq just because of that. Now, I'm no fan of this war, nor the administration's rush to judgement about it. And perhaps Saddam's ridiculous attempts at W's dad's life colored our current president's thinking a certain way.
I don't, however think that was the only reason we invaded. Oil was definitely a big motivating force.
2006-12-11 15:42:32 · answer #4 · answered by Owen 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Typical Republican double standard. Plus, does anyone think that the media MIGHT have something to do with Cindy Sheehan being exploited? They have their hand in EVERYTHING. The poor woman is grieving. How do you think Dubya would react if one of the Bush daughters was killed?
2006-12-11 15:48:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
That isn't why we are at war with Iraq.
She's not mourning. She gave up her son a long time ago.
2006-12-11 15:44:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Mourn is one thing, making a spectacle of ones self in public, and making a mockery of her sons memory, is another!!!
2006-12-11 16:48:28 · answer #7 · answered by ~*LILY*~ 2 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Not by popular demand anyway. Yep how things are worth/worthless to those on the other side of the fence.
2006-12-11 16:08:56 · answer #8 · answered by edubya 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
If I HELLBENT had control of an Army and someone threatened my Dad - they better look out!
2006-12-11 16:37:11 · answer #9 · answered by HELLBENT 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Mourn is one thing.
Exploit is another.
2006-12-11 15:41:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋