The question was about the the occupation of Palestine being the reason for the on going wars "in the middle east."
Why has everyone avoided your question???
I would hate to tell you, there will never be peace between the Zionist and Palestine.
2006-12-11 07:33:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Looks like Americans getting involved in another country's policies, to me.
Hasn't that been an ongoing criticism of the Bush administration? Wouldn't this then be a hypocritical position to take?
And, to answer your question, contrary to anti-Semitic views, Israel is not the cause of all war in the world. Getting rid of Israel will NOT result in a peaceful world. And Palestine will not consider any other option.
2006-12-11 07:30:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
The fact that Jews and Israel exist and the Arabs hate them is THE reason for the ongoing problems in the Middle East. The palestinians could have had a homeland back in 1948.
2006-12-11 08:35:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
The world would be slightly more peaceful. Israel is the aggressor in the Middle East; if Israel stopped invading and occupying neighbouring countries, it would be a significant improvement. The situation wouldn't change throughout the rest of the world, though.
2006-12-11 07:50:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Webber 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Dont think so. Even if Israel and Pasestine can mend fences, Iran will become the target of the next big Israeli military operation. Then all the chess pieces are knocked off the board again
2006-12-11 07:34:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No. Your question presumes that the middle east is the only hot spot on the globe. How about Korea? Bosnia? Afghanistan? Serbia? Croatia? So long as there are men to fight wars, there will be wars somewhere.
2006-12-11 07:23:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by stevijan 5
·
3⤊
1⤋
Sadly there will always be wars and conflicts - it is part of the human condition. When wars of religion and/or political philosophy there will remain conflicts about natural resources. In time there are likely to be wars to control sources of water, as well as other agricultural and mineral resources.
2006-12-11 07:24:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tony B 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
If that is what they think, I hope you realize how collosally silly that is.
So, let us go over a few examples:
The so labeled insurgency and sectatrian violence in Iraq is due to Israel and the local Arabs?
The problems in Lebanon where Hizbollah is trying to take over the entire country is due to Israel and the local Arabs?
Clearly the answer is "no".
2006-12-12 12:46:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by BMCR 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
3 millian hindu were killed in Bangladesh, 3 million armanian christians were killed in Turkey.... I can give you 5 pages of these. so why did they do this if it was JUST ISREAL?
every other religion has had their dark times and they have found a way to cooexist without killing people of other religions but the muslim fanaticals have been doing it since the 1700s and have yet to stop.. why is that?
2006-12-11 07:28:21
·
answer #9
·
answered by CaptainObvious 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yugoslavia, at warfare as one, at peace as many. it truly is somewhat complicated as those complications are in its way. Refugees: The type of Palestinian refugees contain many who were expelled from Jordan and per chance some who declare to be such. there isn't any actual thanks to make certain if someone replaced right into a actual Israeli-Palestinian till in the adventure that they declare to be. in the adventure that they require evidence, that would bring about an excellent type of exact Palestinians who nevertheless can't provide it. Gaza: they'd ought to cajole the leaders in Gaza to finally (as there will be little choose for a violent Hamas employer in peace) provide up their ability completely. Likud and Hamas- nicely they seem in ability so who's going to sue for peace? no longer going, to that end i imagine a 2 state will be more effective.
2016-11-25 21:08:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by shoaf 4
·
0⤊
0⤋