2006-12-11 05:53:20 · 11 answers · asked by bettysdad 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yep, you can always count on good old President Bush to understand and make the greatest decisions .......NOT! Let's get our people the hell outta there and not listen to what he has to say anymore! Hasn't he made enough bad decisions?
2006-12-11 06:10:35 · answer #1 · answered by Marie 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
So is that the latest excuse Dubya has been spouting concerning the war? to honour the dead?! The dead don't give a sh it, They're dead.
Bush has been flushing away our soldiers' lives, billions of dollars and our respect down a toilet since we invaded Iraq. To stay in there would be flushing even more down the toilet. But hey, he's the Decider!
2006-12-11 06:00:28 · answer #2 · answered by Do You See What Happens Larry? 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
That quote from him I must say is an insult to the many thousands of families that would like their children come home today.
Do you really believe that he puts his mind in gear before he opens his mouth? Don't think so.
2006-12-11 05:59:30 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
It is all beside the point. The US should pull out of Iraq if, and only if, the goal is to turn the place into a playground for Taliban and al Qaeda to build nuclear weapons to blow up the United States. See the current issue of Atlantic magazine for details.
2006-12-11 05:59:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Custer honored the first of his dead by not retreating from Little Big Horn.
2006-12-11 06:02:30 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Another example of idiot politics.
He should be in the same cell as Saddam
2006-12-11 05:57:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Cutting and running means their fight was in vain.
Not to mention the jihadists would chase us home.
5 years and no attacks in US? Coincidence?
Why are democrats ignoring Clinton's statements and concern with Iraq?
"Saddam Hussein and the other enemies of peace may have thought that the serious debate currently before the House of Representatives would distract Americans or weaken our resolve to face him down," he said.
"But once more, the United States has proven that although we are never eager to use force, when we must act in America's vital interests, we will do so."
""In this century we learned through harsh experience that the only answer to aggression and illegal behavior is firmness, determination and, when necessary, action," Clinton said. "In the next century, the community of nations may see more and more the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists, drug traffickers, or organized criminals, who travel the world among us unnoticed.
"If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow by the knowledge that they can act with impunity," he said.
"Let me be clear: A military operation cannot destroy all the weapons of mass destruction capacity," Clinton said. "But it can, and will, leave him significantly worse off than he is now in terms of the ability to threaten the world with these weapons. . . . And he will know that the international community continues to have the will to act if and when he threatens again."
2006-12-11 05:57:56 · answer #7 · answered by CP 4 · 1⤊ 6⤋
He says a lot of things that don't make any sense.
2006-12-11 05:55:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
When we cut and run, at that one moment, yes, that is basically throwing the hundreds of billions of dollars and 3000 US Soldeirs lifes away.
2006-12-11 05:59:37 · answer #9 · answered by I Hate Liberals 4 · 0⤊ 5⤋
Quiting would not only dishonor the dead, it would threaten our safety.
2006-12-11 05:55:43 · answer #10 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 1⤊ 6⤋