i know ,football ,cricket & rugby didnt deserve anything but i would have put her behind others , what about calzhage,hatton, i think she got it just because she is a royal if prince charles was the tiddlywink champion he would probably win it.
2006-12-11 05:41:10 · 17 answers · asked by dsw 2 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ Other - Football
She had connections in high places mum being
Princess Anne and she being Zara Philips ll for riding a horse.
2006-12-11 05:51:45 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
the amount of coverage that she'd been receiving was unfair. i bet more than half of the people who voted for her didn't even know who she was a month ago. it was swayed by the fact that she was a royal and her mother had already won it. button shouldn't have been there; he won, what, one race? andrew murray has a crap attitude, maybe they should consider nominating him when he's matured. darren clarke, however good he was at the ryder cup, got a hell of a lot of sympathy votes.
i'd say calzaghe, tweddle, taylor, hatton or panesar were deserving winners. they'd have been better off with a panel, boxing isn't cosy enough sport to have people voting in the masses
theo walcott getting young sports personality was a load of crap. and walliams - why the hell did he win? plenty of people swim the channel for charity. that was just the bbc giving themselves a pat on the back. i don't even watch the bbc, in fact i hate the fu.cking channel. i only pay for it because tv is fast and i like channel 4.
2006-12-11 17:28:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it's a load of old tosh, voted for by middle class, pringle v-neck jersey wearing, volvo driving, boring, dinner party holding, head up their own arses toffs! They just want to pat each other on the back for voting for a Royal when the horse done all the work for goodness sake!! I mean just look who hosts the thing Gary bloody Linekar and that posh bird who hosts wimbledon but won plums when she was actually playing.
Joe Calzaghe was a stand out winner for me.
2006-12-11 13:50:28 · answer #3 · answered by Begbie 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Ive never even heard of her.
But if she´s the only British person doing the business then why not.
I can´t think of any other outstanding british sportsperson at the moment.
Someone mentioned a couple of boxers, wake up boxing has become a joke with all these belts and biff fat boxers fighting.
2006-12-11 15:08:00 · answer #4 · answered by Ganymede 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
fair does she is a world champion and doesn't win that by just be a grand daughter of the queen.
To me Theo walcott winning the young sports personality was a bigger joke . At least the other 2 nominees did something he just had a handful of games mainly as a sub.
2006-12-13 06:37:12 · answer #5 · answered by ianjohnpaul 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OMG I KNOW! she only oen because her mum is famous princess
for gods sake andy murray should have won, he eat the world number one, or atleat peter crouch would be better than her scoring 11 goals in 10 games for country!
2006-12-11 16:28:09 · answer #6 · answered by Bubbles T 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great call, what about Darren Clarke too,he should have won it hands down.Phil taylor is the greatest darts player who ever lived and never gets any due credit he deserves!!!!
2006-12-11 14:58:21 · answer #7 · answered by hellraisersteve 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
couldn't agree more complete pants. you know that she actually thinks thats her job, even though eventing dosen't pay.feel sorry for darren clarke up against a royal. i hope theres more about this disgrace in the press.
2006-12-11 14:35:57 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't know how on earth she won but all should have voted for Darren Clarke! A great sportsman in tragic cirumstances.
2006-12-11 13:50:56 · answer #9 · answered by Bubbles 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's a disgrace, everyone who voted for her should be banned from all future sporting votes..Leave it to real sports fans & they can stick to voting on reality TV shows
2006-12-11 13:45:23 · answer #10 · answered by keefy 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋