Yeah, not high on the totem pole...he's a bottom feeder
2006-12-11 05:02:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by ~LAX Mom~ 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
A celebrity in the sense of Lindsay Lohan's missing underwear. That whole "wha...?" factor.
2006-12-11 05:28:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by The_Cookie_Goddess 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
properly he replaced into till now yet he's being seen in a diverse mild now. in comparison to Britney he's an angel. i like Brit yet she's screwing up vast time. She keeps it up and she or he might lose her toddlers. Who might have thunk.... ok-Fed coming off squeaky clean?
2016-12-11 06:57:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by goslin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
HA HA HA!!!!! Tee hee!
A Celebrity???? Hell no! Just a wannabe who found someone dumb enough to fall for him and unfortunately, he will probably be set for life. He is nothing. A nobody. A talentless, womanizing jerk who spreads his "seed" all over town for anyone who will take it.
2006-12-11 05:30:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by Agent99 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Would you consider George Bush intelligent? I think Fed-Ex would make a better vice president than "celebrity/entertainer"...
2006-12-11 05:02:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by moloch2006 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
He is a celebrity in that he is famous. He is not someone who has accomplished anything, other than being famous.
No hit wonder - too funny!
2006-12-11 06:21:05
·
answer #6
·
answered by Tony M 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
i kno people dont like to accept the fact that he is ...but HE IS he has paparatzi all on him they cant get his name out of the headlines so i guess he is since other celebarties dont have alot of paparatzi on them ...k-fed stold tomkat spotlight
2006-12-11 05:08:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Miisz.RodRIguEz 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd consider him a B-List celebrity at best, maybe even C-List.
2006-12-11 05:01:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by nrebbert 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
Sadly, yes.
I like to think of him more as the world's first no-hit wonder.
2006-12-11 05:07:10
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋
Who?
2006-12-11 05:02:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by GRUMPY1LUVS2EAT 5
·
0⤊
2⤋