English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Was Princess Diana a terrorist? If so, then Clinton took care of her

2006-12-11 04:59:50 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23377815-details/Diana+was+bugged+by+secret+service+in+US/article.do

2006-12-11 05:01:10 · update #1

17 answers

Interesting. There are 15 answers prior to mine, and not one liberal has said it was wrong for the Clinton administration to be wiretapping Princess Diana.

I guess the liberals only get upset if the USA wiretaps terrorists without their permissioin, or maybe only when Republicans do it.

2006-12-11 06:29:53 · answer #1 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 2 1

That doesn't say anything. Why would a princess be a terrorist? If she had a relationship with Clinton then it won't be shocking to me. It is also rumored that she had an affair with JFK Jr, when he tried to interviewed her for his magazine. As a friend of Diana says, they went to the hotel President Kennedy used to take Marilyn Monroe. I think that friend even wrote a book about it. All of them are high profile and powerful people, so it makes sense that they would have sex.

2006-12-11 05:15:04 · answer #2 · answered by cynical 6 · 0 1

Clinton was Tapping Princess Di??? She was on his list?

Oh you mean taping! Oh..that's an entirely different thing.

2006-12-11 05:16:45 · answer #3 · answered by RustyOwls 3 · 2 0

I'm no Clinton fan, but let's wait for all the facts.

There may be much LESS than meets the eye to this.

2006-12-11 05:27:50 · answer #4 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 1 0

Do you get your news from The National Enquirer and the other tabloids at the checkout stand at the supermarket? This is a British version of one of those rags. I need something more credible than this to even think there is a shred of truth. The thing I wonder amount is how much they paid their "sources" for this story.

2006-12-11 05:08:32 · answer #5 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 0 2

Maybe he was hoping to date her? After all he was a womanizer. But why keep bring up the Clinton Adminstration? He is not in office? Really this plagues my mind. The guy should have left office when he was impeached. PERIOD.

2006-12-11 05:12:39 · answer #6 · answered by wondermom 6 · 2 1

Clinton should have been tapping Bin Laden's phones, not some princess who has no real power...what a waste of tax payers money. And yet the libs whine about Bush's wire tapping, even though their boy was doing it, and without any good reason. At least Bush is trying to stop terrorism

2006-12-11 05:01:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 4

The rumors have already been placed to chill out by employing the investigating committee that in simple terms gave their rfile. They extraordinarily spoke to this rumor and denied they got here upon something to assist the style of concept.

2016-12-18 11:28:04 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I do not disagree with the tapping of terrorists telephones I just don't want the guy in office and his people being the ones I give this power too. I do not trust what he will do with it.

And besides this doesn't scare you that our government is doing these types of things.

2006-12-11 05:04:13 · answer #9 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 0 3

He probably believed there was some hope of her replacing Monica under the oval office desk.

2006-12-11 05:03:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers