Which, and for what reasons?
2006-12-11 04:51:32 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
They should spend all their time not getting abortions themselves and stop trying to impose their will on the rest of the world.
2006-12-11 04:53:34 · answer #1 · answered by Dastardly 6 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Apart from the moral issue that abortion is nothing less than premeditated murder, I am very concerned that in today's world there is still need for abortion purely on the basis of birth control. (As opposed to aborting the fetus in cases of rape, incest or deformity due to health reasons). With the easy availability of contraceptives, I cannot excuse abortion as a form of birth control on any moral or ethical basis! Those opposed to abortion (for these reasons) should in fact speak out against it globally, for it is a global "sickness"!
2006-12-11 13:13:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
We trade barrow and conduct negotiations with a nation in which millions of abortions are performed every year and nothing will change this .
Its like going to the child molesters house to get sugar and ignoring the fact that he is what he is because he has cheap sugar and lots of it .Not that you do not have other sources for sugar bit it would cost more .a few penny's more but bottom line over ten years you can save 20 thousand dollars so you choose to do business with a known offender .
Our whole society is based on how much you have and not what you contribute .
2006-12-11 13:09:27 · answer #3 · answered by -----JAFO---- 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I categorically do not want people like that coming to England. Telling a scared, lonely teenage girl who has made a mistake that she should leave school and give up her teenage years to raise a child she doesn't want is morally reprehensible and I would strongly oppose anyone like that coming here.
2006-12-11 13:59:08 · answer #4 · answered by Katya-Zelen 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I could not care less? Politically speaking they would have little impact on a global scale, but I suppose they can have influence in the states by voting or petitioning but there are far more pro choice people then anti-abortionists.
2006-12-11 12:54:36 · answer #5 · answered by trigunmarksman 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They should focus on the lawmakers, and not terrorizing young women at very vulnerable and private times in their lives. And they should not have abortions themselves (no 'I had one, and I regret it, so now I will stop others') and they should adopt, and take young pregnant women into their homes to give them alternative. And donate time to free child care services. And be against the death penalty and the war, and everything else their religion teaches them, including tolerance.
2006-12-11 12:58:43 · answer #6 · answered by hichefheidi 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
They should spend time globally because other countries have allowed abortion. But they only care about what happens in their own country, so no.
2006-12-11 13:00:45 · answer #7 · answered by cynical 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Actually, I once heard about some American anti-abortion activists who went to England to protest their abortion laws and got arrested. You might be interested to know that, strangely enough, Pat Robertson supports China's one-child laws, whose enforcement sometimes consists of forced abortions.
2006-12-11 12:55:49 · answer #8 · answered by tangerine 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Americans who oppose abortion have much more influence here. When abortion is outlawed here, we should try to influence other nations to respect the rights of the unborn.
2006-12-11 13:00:11 · answer #9 · answered by iraqisax 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think they spend time acting globally; not just the U.S., we are trying to make a better world for oursleves why not act globally.
2006-12-11 12:55:33 · answer #10 · answered by amazon 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋