I remember 2 years ago, when US people was criticizing france to not enter in the iraq war.things have changed, right?
now it is sound after losing poorly this war, you would like to step back and ask your self why? why we didn't do like france...can we go back in the time?
isn't it better to be a coward, instead to be in this deep s...t with no exit?
how do you feel to be a US citizen and having blood of innocent people on your US flag?
2006-12-11 04:33:25 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ronald Reagan understood how to deal with the French..... remember what happened with the air strike in Libya?
2006-12-11 04:37:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Oh, you mean like the many arabs and blacks whose blood stains the French flag? Vous etes bete!
Iraq is better now than it was under Saddam. France has always been a cowards paradise, with its last real warrior being Napolean (who was not even french.) The last competent warrior of France was the Hammer, who prevented the Muslim overrun of western Europe back in the 900's.
France was motivated by the criminal bribes received from food-for-oil violations. But that does not matter, because France has always been a racist paradise (think Picard and the Elder Protocols to name a few.) Go choke. You were born in the wrong era. You would have been perfect for the Vichey government.
C'est domage q'est que tu es un troglodyte.
2006-12-11 04:44:17 · answer #2 · answered by lundstroms2004 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
What world do YOU come from? France was never cowardly. Incompetent, boorish, and thankless, yes. But not cowardly. Second, who's losing? There's a difference between being held back by politicians and actually losing a war. We were WINNING in Vietnam before being forced to pull the plug because of similar propaganda by a left-leaning press. And that innocent blood is NOT on our flag, but on the hands of insane Muslim terrorists and the muslims who refuse to stop them. We are only trying to give a popularly elected government a chance to actually succeed.
2006-12-11 04:43:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes I do. They seem to want the money that they were getting from Sadam and did nothing to stop him from killing his own people. They have tried some many times to keep the sanctions from working that it is a shame.
Also every time a war comes along they surrender to who ever that is fighting them!
NO it is NOT better to be a coward!
2006-12-11 04:40:11 · answer #4 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Nobody has taken the French seriously for 200 years as a military, intellectual, political, or moral force in the world. The only thing they will fight to death for these days is their right to eight week vacations every summer.
2006-12-11 04:52:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
surrender monkeys are all he French will ever be in the eyes of the world not just the USA
At least the USA wants to rid the world of terrorist and Nazislamic fascist while France embraced the terrorist
2006-12-11 04:40:46 · answer #6 · answered by Deport all ILLEGAL Alien INVADER 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Yes. The French are still cowards.
2006-12-11 04:37:18 · answer #7 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Yes. But not only for the Iraq war thing...they have a history of cowardice. BUT, if the U.S. had more support from other countries, don't you think things would be going better in Iraq?
2006-12-11 04:36:33 · answer #8 · answered by sacolunga 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Not cowards..but ungrateful a$$holes with oder problems
2006-12-11 04:46:06 · answer #9 · answered by Xander 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
France are still cowards...Sorry Frenchy, it's a fact.
2006-12-11 04:35:50 · answer #10 · answered by RustyOwls 3 · 5⤊ 2⤋