I'm not gay but I guess that it would be like any relationship... Good looking girls are more work than they're worth sometimes.
If ya want to be happy get a so-so looking one they're more appreciative!
2006-12-11 02:44:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
He was a handsome man, wasn't he? He just didn't seem like the type that was stuck on looks...maybe he was attracted to them for what was on the inside.
2006-12-11 02:42:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by metalmom71 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
beauty is in the eye of the beholder or beer holder...lol since u know who freddie mercury is then u should know what kinda stuff he did when he wasnt singing.lol mayb apperance didnt matter to him...
2006-12-11 02:47:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by smalls8802 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only one person in a couple can hold the spotlight. The other guys probably had magnetic personalities.
2006-12-11 02:43:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by braennvin2 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Its an old but true saying..beauty is in the eye of the beholder...we all see things differently...
2006-12-11 02:41:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by geordie.lady 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Maybe what is ugly to you was beautiful to him. They were his lovers not yours.
2006-12-11 02:51:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by eeyoree rocks2003 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, that's your opinion....personally I think he looked like a ugly 1970's porn star.....
2006-12-11 02:49:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by ~LAX Mom~ 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
ewwww.. he was one ugly man... lucky for him, beauty is in the eye of the beholder
2006-12-11 02:41:02
·
answer #8
·
answered by puresatin 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
To him they weren't ugly.
2006-12-11 03:57:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Judas Rabbi 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because he was a queer.
2006-12-11 02:43:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋