English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

I'm not gay but I guess that it would be like any relationship... Good looking girls are more work than they're worth sometimes.
If ya want to be happy get a so-so looking one they're more appreciative!

2006-12-11 02:44:26 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 1 0

He was a handsome man, wasn't he? He just didn't seem like the type that was stuck on looks...maybe he was attracted to them for what was on the inside.

2006-12-11 02:42:51 · answer #2 · answered by metalmom71 3 · 0 0

beauty is in the eye of the beholder or beer holder...lol since u know who freddie mercury is then u should know what kinda stuff he did when he wasnt singing.lol mayb apperance didnt matter to him...

2006-12-11 02:47:32 · answer #3 · answered by smalls8802 2 · 0 0

Only one person in a couple can hold the spotlight. The other guys probably had magnetic personalities.

2006-12-11 02:43:23 · answer #4 · answered by braennvin2 5 · 0 0

Its an old but true saying..beauty is in the eye of the beholder...we all see things differently...

2006-12-11 02:41:58 · answer #5 · answered by geordie.lady 6 · 0 1

Maybe what is ugly to you was beautiful to him. They were his lovers not yours.

2006-12-11 02:51:36 · answer #6 · answered by eeyoree rocks2003 7 · 0 0

Well, that's your opinion....personally I think he looked like a ugly 1970's porn star.....

2006-12-11 02:49:11 · answer #7 · answered by ~LAX Mom~ 5 · 0 1

ewwww.. he was one ugly man... lucky for him, beauty is in the eye of the beholder

2006-12-11 02:41:02 · answer #8 · answered by puresatin 5 · 1 2

To him they weren't ugly.

2006-12-11 03:57:30 · answer #9 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 0 0

Because he was a queer.

2006-12-11 02:43:02 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers