Should George Bush Stand Trial for Crimes Against Humanity?

Answer 1

I think for the invasion of Iraq with no real proof of WMD would be a valid reason, If Iraq is under dictatorship, then that is for Iraq to deal with, they were an independant country, and really should stay that way and sort their own problems out. Using some half baked accusation of owning WMD doesnt really support the argument for full blown war, and the encouragement of other countries to get involved too.
Weather Bush or not, someone should stand trial for that.

Answer 2

some say he's dedicated crimes (not basically crimes against humanity), and others say he hasn't. How do any of them understand? the right place for determining innocence or guilt is a courtroom of regulation, and he could take transport of his day in courtroom. in my view, i think of he's responsible of many crimes.

Answer 3

Hope you are not American and if your are then you should be ashamed of yourself for asking such a dumb question, do you even understand the question of crimes against humanity.
Let me give you a few clues to get you orientated:
1) Hitler "The final solution"
2) Stalin He had more russians and jews killed then Hitler managed.
3) POLPOT "THE KILLING FIELDS" of Cambodia

These are just three examples of Fascist Dictators, your president anything like them, don't think so numb nuts.

Answer 4

He deserves some credit for having the compassion to help the oppressed in Iraq, and trying to secure a "American Friendly" country in the Middle East. It's called long-term thinking, something the young, and/or the stupid don't understand.

Eventually, without this, these countries will be over-run by the radical, and they will try to crush us. We are the infedels to them, and they want us DEAD.

Love cannot exist without choice. I can't MAKE you love someone. Radical Islam says "Love Allah, or die". Does that sound like choice?

If you people win, I hope that you can see from your grave the torment and despair that your children will face in the world as these people gain power.

Answer 5

Only if they charge every american that thinks its okay to go and take other peoples lands and rights away simply to "think ahead". Last time i checked though, the us government is big on telling everyone else what to do, but not to keen on actually following those rules. It more like do what i say, not what i do. Additionaly, they should try all those yokels who cant spell correctly but get on here and tell anyone who says anything against Bush that automatically they are 1) Democrat, 2) a bleeding heart Liberal, or 3) just plain (Insert explative here) dumb, for giving us a President that cant even serve his country properly. You know what screw it lets just put the south on trial, according to them we are all immoral Liberal bleeding hearts who want to spend your money on every one but you, but yes lets all be republicans so we can screw over everyone but ourselves. YOu people are jokes and need to open up your eyes. The republicans didnt just get kicked out of congress becuase they did such a good job.

Answer 6

What?! Dear god, there are too many of you in this world. Your children will be a crime against the gene pool.

Answer 7

If they did...they would have put all of those who voted for the war with Iraq....which would be most of congress....and UN officials.
Just because they "changed their mind" wouldn't cut it.....it didn't work for the followers of Hitler.
So the prospect of him being tried is nil.

Answer 8

Name one.

Answer 9

No but your momma needs to stand trial for smelliness.

Answer 10

No and what crimes are we talking about anyway?