2006-12-11 01:29:11 · 12 answers · asked by AlOnEiNtHeRaIn 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Syria and Iran aren't honorable country's under their current regime's. They cannot be trusted to do as they say. An example of that is the president of Iran, Ahmadinejad has completely denied the Holocaust ever took place, yet there is enough evidence of that happening, that one could write volumes of the atrocities against the Jews throughout Europe and Russia.
The European community, along with the US do not believe that Iran's intentions for nuclear power are peaceful, yet Iran insists that it is. Both Iran and Syria are the supplier of arms, ammunitions, insurgents and anything supportive of both the insurgency and Hezbollah. Syria is the architect behind the political murders in Lebanon. You ask why the US will not talk with these low life swine? I hope this answers your question!
2006-12-11 01:55:31 · answer #1 · answered by briang731/ bvincent 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Russia and China, no. Syria and Iran, actually. permit's get something in the present day approximately Iran. they don't look to be Arabs, they're Persians. for people who're not conscious, Iran and Iraq fought an 8 three hundred and sixty 5 days conflict not all that for the time of the past. Iran isn't Iraq's best chum, it basically sees an threat to assist the hatred against united statesa.. Iran is extra of a danger to Iraq than we are. Bringing in those 2 international locations alongside with others interior the area is the only thank you to look after some style of peace and permit a central authority to start to take carry in Iraq. we would desire to objective a coverage of inclusion. Get as many people from diverse international locations interior the area to take part in talks. the U. S. has been manipulating international locations and leaders in that area for years, it fairly is time we stopped.
2016-12-11 06:50:56 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Thats what Iran an Syria want.....what elp they can do except stop financing and suppling the insurgency.
This would make it easier to take control and split up the country without war with Iraq, which it has been trying to do for decades.
Their motives are suspicious.
2006-12-11 01:38:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because syria and iran wan't the opposite results of what the rest of the world wants.
2006-12-11 01:34:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because Syria and Iran are apparently incapable of doing any kind of good.
2006-12-11 01:31:39 · answer #5 · answered by SatanicYoda 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because they shouldn't, they're causing some of the problems. But Egypt, Jordan and the other friendly Muslim countries in the area should have been on board from the start....
2006-12-11 01:35:43 · answer #6 · answered by Hiqutipie 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You not serious, between the two of them they would carve up Iraq for themselves and the Iraqi's would have a new occupying force in their country who would never leave.
2006-12-11 01:36:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because they are the ones supporting the insurgents. They have their own agenda for Iraq.
2006-12-11 01:36:50 · answer #8 · answered by ski_master 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Let's see ... should we ask two countries who train and sponsor terrorism around the world, particularly in the Middle East, for advice on dealing with the elimination of a terrorist regime? Ya, sounds reasonable to me!
SNAP OUT OF IT!!!!!! Learn something about the problem before you post a dumb question like this one!
2006-12-11 01:36:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
We have been. the problem is the inability to trust those nations that support an underground terror network.
2006-12-11 01:38:02 · answer #10 · answered by only p 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋