It was quite long too.Hey craig is all iam there for and the bang.. th gun and the kissing.. why does bond movie have all that.
2006-12-11 01:22:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by elizabeth 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The first Casino Royale was better with
David Niven staring
2006-12-11 01:27:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
"total poo" - anyone who says something like that should probably be watching some kiddie Disney film.
Its an action movie - and it has action and suspense - but it doesn't appeal to the teddybear fantasy peacefaction crowd.
Update: @ celestite : Did I use obscene words in my post above ? No. Maybe I'd have said "very poor" or something if I hadn't liked the film,,,, no one has to swear you're quite right. Yet to describe something as "poo" always seems too girly girl girl for me.... jolly hockey sticks and polo and a fortnightly Shrek DVD fun night in, and pyjama parties..... its a clue straight away why such a person wouldn't have enjoyed Casino Royale.
2006-12-11 01:22:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Joe Bloggs 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yes
2006-12-11 01:21:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I really enjoyed it. It was a little more grown up than the earlier Bond films.
2006-12-11 10:31:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by Gail H 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no. i really enjoyed this film. apart from the few people answering this question and you i have not heard anyone say anything bad about it, but fair enough if you didnt enjoy it, we all have our own opinions.
2006-12-11 03:32:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by sopatt 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Worst Bond film ever and I have seen them all..
2006-12-11 01:27:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by JOHN W 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
furiouspurposeuk, you would probably have used obscene words wouldn't you? Because that's dead mature and grown up.
2006-12-11 02:15:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
i fell asleep to it was boring
2006-12-11 01:20:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
yea
2006-12-11 01:39:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by dream theatre 7
·
0⤊
0⤋