I think 50% of what he made when they were together.
2006-12-10 22:54:18 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Books & Authors
i think shes a money hungry ho ho merry xmas
i dont think she should have a penny of his money that he made before they were married
and yep i agree with you 50% of what was made when together
2006-12-10 22:56:34 · answer #1 · answered by DeeDee 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you about the 50% because in a relationship everything should be like that. I mean come on if he does have to give her that then he will lose i think atleast 500 million. I heard he was worth 1.3 billion. Maybe thats England pounds for I know. But I agree.
2006-12-11 06:56:58 · answer #2 · answered by deathboy13669 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
First of all, she does not deserve a penny. He's done all the hard work, gave her the opportunity to live like a queen, made all the money, etc. and what did she do? nothing.
And second, how is this question in any way related to "Books and Authors" ???
2006-12-11 07:14:10 · answer #3 · answered by Katy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not the £20m or something - that's a stupid amount of money. Surely maintenance for their daughter, a house and either a reasonable lump sum or monthly/yearly payment. If she helped him make any of his money she is entitled to more. If she did nothing other than marry him and have his child why should she be entitled to more? How much money does she need to live? That's all she needs!
2006-12-11 06:56:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree I don't feel it should include what he had before marrying her (I think his net value is 3.5b gbp or something which she shouldn't be a part of because most of it was investments and what not from his "beatles" days
I am curios how much does she think she needs with the media deals and everything she will be set for life without taking money from him.
2006-12-11 06:59:47 · answer #5 · answered by whay i lost my ?s 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
50% of his income while they were married, up until the day she left. Although, if he gets taken for more it is his own fault for ignoring advice to get a pre- or post-nuptial agreement.
2006-12-11 07:33:28 · answer #6 · answered by eilishaa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She should get the royalties for "When I'm 64," since they separated just before his 64th birthday. She can indorse the checks with "No" and her signature.
Of course, I'm an irony fan.
2006-12-11 06:57:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Paul should keep the leg and give her the boot
2006-12-11 06:56:04 · answer #8 · answered by I-Like-Chicha&Ceviche 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
It depends on how many tears she sheds and how much hair she rips out in court.
2006-12-11 06:55:47 · answer #9 · answered by citrusy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not a brown penny support for the daughter though
2006-12-11 06:55:48 · answer #10 · answered by knowsitallandabitmore 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋