she will be just fine...just warm it up so it is nice and warm like mom's milk...sometimes the mom's milk isn't even as good..but don't let her get lazy and leave the milk out all night, you get up if you have to, and give your little daughter your little angel the milk but make sure you don't scald it, ....and it is good she doesn't give her baby the milk with the meds in it...whole milk at this age is just fine....God Bless
2006-12-10 22:38:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by MotherKittyKat 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
I am less concerned about her digestive system and more concerned about her teeth. She shouldnt be having milk often during the night because the sugar in the milk will rot her teeth.
As far as the digestion goes, children under 1 year are usually not given cow's milk. Baby formula would be best unless otherwise directed by your doctor.
2006-12-11 01:56:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by jenniferaboston 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
She should be fine. My oldest son started whole milk at 10 months because he refused formula. Most doctors will tell you around 11 months to start mixing a little whole milk in with their formula or breastmilk. As long as your daughter does not act like it hurts her tummy or anything I would not worry. The only thing I would be concerned about is the fact she is keeping it out all night.
2006-12-11 01:47:59
·
answer #3
·
answered by mommyofthree 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
An 11 month old should not be drinking cow's milk. Under one year of age, milk has no place in the diet. They supply too much protein, potassium, and sodium and not enough calories for the growing infant. Children also need the fat for proper growth and development including brain development.
Small amounts of cow's milk are ok to give but not instead of breastmilk/formula. If your wife cannot breastfeed, your daughter needs to be on formula until she's at least a year old.
2006-12-10 22:38:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by dr_imzadi 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
It won't hurt her but there really isn't the samke nutritional value as formula and breast milk...if you are substituting anyway, why not use formula...it will actually help the baby sleep longer. Your daughter will be off breast milk and formula soon enough...maybe let her have formula for a while...it has a lot of nutrients in it anyway...good luck!
2006-12-10 22:46:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mommy to One 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
i tried to commence providing entire milk to my son at 11 months - wondering the transition at 365 days must be less demanding that way, if he were given used to the style. My son had his first bottle of it at 11 months, and then later that day I presented him a bottle of formula. He replaced into SO mad! He favored the style of milk to the style of the formula, so he did change over at 11 months thoroughly. We did commence with techniques from warming it up only slightly. not a lot, yet barely adequate to take the coolness from being interior the refrigerator. We in elementary words had to attempt this for type of two-3 weeks and then he all started eating it straight away from the refrigerator. We presented it to my daughter round 11 months besides, yet like each and everything else that had to do with foodstuff/drink, she replaced into complicated! She hated the style, no remember what we did to it. We kept providing it to her, yet kept her on the degree 2 formula interior the interim. At 15 months she nonetheless hated milk, yet as well replaced into not eating foodstuff (she did not eat till she replaced into 18 months previous, and by no skill loved toddler foodstuff ever), so we did not ideas too a lot, as she nonetheless needed formula to get her foodstuff. At her 15 month appointment although, the clinical specialist stated that we commence making a minimum of one million-2 cups an afternoon of her formula with milk as a replace of water. That way she nonetheless were given the foodstuff, yet as well were given the fat from the milk. She loved that, and as she began to eat some ingredients, we all started slowly including a lot less and a lot less formula powder, till she replaced into eating straight away milk. she is going to be 2 in ought to, and she only now will drink milk chilly, even although she drinks water and juice chilly. they're all diverse, so it gained't damage in any respect to introduce it now for the style.
2016-11-30 10:28:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Makes the heart work over time trying the turn all that food into energy, then it only stores it as fat, the kind that's hard to get rid of, not to say how it's hard on the pancres & causes Diabetis.
2006-12-10 22:37:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Ask your physician.
2006-12-10 22:37:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by JusMe 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
That's not a good idea.
Milk and dairy
"Now we come to one of the most controversial and misunderstood items in the Western diet.
Orientals and Africans have traditionally avoided milk- except as a purgative. But in the Western world, people are told to drink milk everyday throughout their lives.
If we look at nature, we see that the young feed exclusively on milk until weaned away from it with other foods. The natural disappearance of the milk-digesting enzyme lactase from the human system upon reaching maturity proves that adult humans have no more nutritional need for milk than adult tigers or chimpanzees.
Though milk is a complete protein food when consumed raw, it also contains fat, which means that it combines poorly with any other food except itself. Yet adults today routinely 'wash down' other foods with cold milk. Milk curdles immediately upon entering the stomach, so if there is other food present the curds coagulate around other food particles and insulate them from exposure to gastric juices, delaying digestion long enough to permit the onset of putrefaction. Therefore, the first and foremost rule of milk consumption is, 'Drink it alone, or leave it alone.'
Today, milk is made even more indigestible by the universal practice of pasteurization, which destroys its natural enzymes and alters its delicate proteins.
Raw milk contains the active enzymes lactase and lipase, which permit raw milk to digest itself. Pasteurized milk, which is devitalized of lactase and other active enzymes, simply can not be properly digested by adult stomachs, and even infants have trouble with it, as evidenced by colic, rashes, respiratory ailments, gas and other common ailments of bottle-fed babies. The lack of enzymes and alteration of vital proteins also renders the calcium and other mineral elements in milk largely unassailable.
During the 1930's, Dr. Francis M. Pottenger conducted a 10-year study on the relative effects of pasteurized and raw milk diets on 900 cats. One group received nothing but raw whole milk, while the other was fed nothing but pasteurized whole milk from the same source.
The raw milk group thrived, remaining healthy, active and alert throughout their lives, but the group fed on pasteurized milk soon became listless, confused and highly vulnerable to a host of chronic degenerative ailments normally associated with humans, including heart disease, kidney failure, thyroid dysfunction, respiratory ailments, loss of teeth, brittle bones, liver inflammation, etc.
But what caught Dr. Pottenger's attention most was what happened to the second and third generations.
The first offspring of the pasteurized milk group were all born with poor teeth and small, weak bones- a clear cut sign of calcium deficiency, which indicated lack of calcium absorption from pasteurized milk.
The offspring of the raw milk group remained as healthy as their parents.
Many of the kittens in third generation of the pasteurized group were stillborn, while those that survived were all sterile and unable to reproduce.
The experiment had to end there because there was no fourth generation of cats fed on pasteurized milk, although the raw milk group continued to breed and thrive indefinitely.
If that is insufficient proof of the ill effects of pasteurized milk, take note of the fact even that newborn calves fed on pasteurized milk taken from their own mother cows usually die within six months, a fact which the commercial dairy industry is loathe to admit.
Despite such scientific evidence in favor of raw milk and against pasteurized milk, and despite the fact that until the early twentieth century the human species thrived on raw milk, it is actually illegal to sell raw milk to consumers in all but a few states in America today.
It is far more profitable to the dairy industry to pasteurize milk to extend its shelf-life, though such denatured milk does nothing whatsoever to extend human life.
Furthermore, pasteurization renders milk from sick cows in unsanitary dairies relatively 'harmless' by killing some, but not all, dangerous germs, and this too cuts costs for the dairy industry.
It required only three generations for Dr. Pottenger's pasteurized milk fed cats to become sterile and enfeebled. That's about how many generations of Americans and Europeans have fed on pasteurized milk. Today, infertility has become a major problem for your American couples, while calcium deficiency has become so rampant that over 90 percent of all American children suffer chronic tooth decay.
To make things worse, milk is now routinely 'homogenized' to prevent the cream from separating from the milk. This involves the fragmentation and pulverization of the fat molecules to the point that they will not separate from the rest of the milk. But it also permits there tiny fragments of milk fat to easily pass through the villa of the small intestine, greatly increasing the amount of denatured fat and cholesterol absorbed by the body. In fact, you absorb more milk-fat from homogenized milk than you do from pure cream!
Women worried about osteoporosis should take note of these facts about pasteurized milk products. That such denatured milk does not deliver sufficient calcium to prevent this condition is abundantly evident from the fact that American women, who consume great quantities of pasteurized milk products, suffer the world's highest incidence of osteoporosis.
Raw cabbage, for example, supplies far more available calcium than any quantity of pasteurized milk, yogurt, cottage cheese, or any other denatured dairy product.
Recent studies at the Human Research Centre in Grand Folks, North Dakota, indicates that the element boron is also an essential factor in absorbing calcium from food and utilizing it to build bones.
Even more noteworthy, the level of estrogen in the blood of women given sufficient quantities of boron more than doubled, eliminating the need for estrogen replacement therapy, which is a common stopgap measure against osteoporosis in the West. And where do we find boron? In fresh fruits and vegetables, especially apples, pears, grapes, nuts, cabbage, and other leafy vegetables, where we also find calcium. Nature has already provided abundant sources of all the vital nutrients we need in synergetic form, but man insists on cooking and processing them to death, and then wonders why his diet doesn't 'work'.
Adults should seriously reconsider milk as a constitute of their daily diets, unless they are able to obtain raw certified milk, which is an excellent food.
To stuff children with pasteurized milk in order to make them grow 'strong and healthy' is sheer folly, because they simply cannot assimilate the nutrients.
Indeed men, women, and children alike should eliminate all pasteurized dairy products from their diets, for these denatured dairy products only gum up the intestines with layer upon layer of slimy sludge that interferes with the absorption of organic nutrients."
2006-12-10 22:34:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by bezsenný 5
·
0⤊
3⤋
Good question .
Thanks I will also wait for answers..
2006-12-10 22:33:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋