English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

100% agree

2006-12-12 18:47:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

That equation is untrue, especially for a country in the Middle East. People can debate whether or not we should be there (a freedom that we have in the USA), but Iraq would not get better just by us leaving the country. It would be the "Survival of the Fittest!" Essentially, that would mean that more killings would occur and gangs forming. Will we ultimately win the war over there? That is a better question, one without a true answer.

2006-12-11 19:11:09 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It was none too peaceful under the previous management-ask the Kurds.

2006-12-11 04:36:33 · answer #3 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 0 0

No. But I do not understand why you ask the same question with slight variations over and over again.

2006-12-11 09:36:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Relatively / Comparatively peaceful...

Way better without the U.S. than with it. Bush and co destroyed for good.

2006-12-11 04:31:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The peoples of the middle east have been killing each other over religious beliefs since before Jesus was born. I doubt they'll stop anytime soon.

2006-12-11 04:33:49 · answer #6 · answered by Mad Dog Johnson 4 · 0 2

Yes I can tell by the way Sunnis and Shias are killing each other.

2006-12-11 04:32:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Sure

2006-12-11 05:20:02 · answer #8 · answered by walid_abazza 2 · 0 0

nope we got to leave iraq stat .we are f-----g it up big time.

2006-12-11 04:34:44 · answer #9 · answered by scooprandell 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers