1. For a president to admittingly have used cocaine in his younger days
2. For a president to pardon 4 people, not affiliated with oneanother, who were convicted for smuggling cocaine in a court of law
(One of the above was done by Bush, the other Clinton)
2006-12-10 16:46:43 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
I did some reseach, as suggested. I hope it helps with people giving me answers to my question:
There is no evidence that bush is drinking, nor doing drugs.
They DID impeach Clinton for LYING TO A GRAND JURY (most people go to prison for that) during an i investigation of sexual assault. In the questioning he lied about getting a bj, which shows his lack of respect for our judicial system.
Bush has not killed any civilians. Civilians are a casualty of EVERY war. Saddam, however targetted civilians. For instance, he gassed to death 300 thousand kurdish people because they were kurds. I would like your definition of civilian, because it obviously includes everyone who is not wearing a uniform, even if they are carrying rifles and bombs.
I do remember iran Contra. Iran was the worse of two evils, and Iraq was at war with them. Read "The Art of War". "The enemy of my enemy is my friend".
It sounds like you are the one who needs to do some research
2006-12-11 00:53:58 · update #1
The worst, worst would have to be anyone that's playing with the terrorists and their families.
Lets see who might that be???
I wouldn't know who smuggled Bin Ladin out in the middle of the night right after 9/11 was it Clinton?? No don't think that's right.
2006-12-11 03:32:39 · answer #1 · answered by wondermom 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is still drinking & probably doing coke. Either that or his brain is gone from what he used to do. They tried to impeach Clinton for a BJ, but Bush has killed so many of our people, not to mention how many innocent Iraqis died (including children). While we're at it, remember Iran Contra? (Bush Sr) Our country sold the weapons to the Iraqis & now they want to take them out. Do some research friend, & stop listening to Fox news & Rush ( who was never convicted for his oxy's)
2006-12-10 16:56:59 · answer #2 · answered by shermynewstart 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Having fried what brain you have on coke would be worse. Even worse still is being involved in the importation and distribution of cocaine, and continuing to use it while in the Whitehouse.
All presidents pardon felons that have business connections with them or have damaging information. It has become one of the unlawful privileges they take to themselves.
2006-12-10 16:54:26 · answer #3 · answered by Gaspode 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would guess that ignoring multiple attacks on the US by a specific extremist trumps all 3.
And preventing such from happenning again for 5 years is quite an accomplishment. Maybe its because they are all somewhere else fighting our military, not our office workers.
2006-12-10 16:56:20 · answer #4 · answered by CP 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i would have to say #2, that would be a bigger deal, i wouldnt pardon anyone for smuggling, or dealing..thats just wrong..
and for #1, its no big deal if they used cocain when they were younger..we all have made mistakes...
2006-12-10 16:58:06 · answer #5 · answered by Nikkib 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would guess that starting a war for the profit of your buddies out trumps either one of those.
2006-12-10 16:52:39 · answer #6 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush is the worst
2006-12-10 16:55:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm shocked, SHOCKED at this outrageous behavior. I will renounce my citizenship.
2006-12-10 20:12:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋