Bill Cliton
2006-12-10 17:05:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by sdbrian92108 2
·
1⤊
4⤋
Ok Layla B. I think actually agree with Leperman and think that the person who is on crack is you. Reading what you put down, it seems that you got your information from Nazi books in a school library that were published by "experts". Have you even read Mein Kampf? I doubt that you have. Hitler was not just some crazy person. If Hitler was crazy people would have disregarded him as a lunatic. He was popular because he spoke the mind of the common people. The Beer Hall Putsch which you are refering to was an attempt to overthrow the Bavarian government at the time. It was not 'proper' and was certainly not benefiting the common man. Germany was being slavinized, and Germanism was basically being thrown out the window to make way for the communist slavics. Kind of like the illegal immigration that the United States is going through right now. He was given the minimum sentence in jail because people sympathized with him and generally believed in what he was supporting. Is there anything wrong with nationalism? I think not. Now since it seems you want to go through the question of good vs bad, the Treaty of Versailles was in NO WAY a good treaty. Austria started the war, and Austria being Germany's only true ally came to Austria's aid. Now the allies decide that since Germany was the first to invade another country, they should be the ones punished. Is that in any way fair? Their army was reduced to almost nothing, a substantial amount of land that was rightfully theirs was given to Poland, and they were made to assume the debts of the war making their deutschmarks worth almost nothing. Hundreds of thousands of families were on the street and it was a depression far greater than the one here in the USA. I'm sure that many people's heads have been poisioned by jewish propaganda. Now I am not a racist, but saying someone is evil for trying to preserve a diminishing race is just stupid. Does anyone say anything about Israel being evil? No. The media thinks it is right for Israel to try to boss around middle eastern territory. Most jewish people use the holocaust to their advantage so they can control most of the world and get away with most of their schemes. It is sad that so few people realize this.All of these double standards make me sick. Hitler was kind to all kinds of animals, little children, and people in poverty. He also lifted the depression out of Germany. So props to you LeperMan for understanding this.
However, I would say that Joseph Stalin is the worst person in the world. People were just idiots to listen to that drunkard Churchill.
2006-12-11 04:56:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Regnbyge O 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
The answer is obious. That fat alcoholic scumbag Winston Churchill. If it wasn't for him WWII would have never started. Poland would be Germany's(which is rightfully theirs in the first place) communism would be dead since long ago, violent crime would be at an all time low. The SS were very good at keeping violent crime to a bare minimum and it was safe for Germans to walk the streets. Child molestation and all the sick **** that goes on in this world would NOT be tolerated. People like that were executed by the Nazis. The entire world would not be conquered, contrary to what many idiots believe. The Nazis just wanted the land that was rightfully theres and Russia as living space. France would have never been taken over because Nazi objective was never to occupy it. France was stupid enough to declare war(and then get slaughtered in 2 weeks lol). England would not have been taken over because most of British parliament didn't like the idea of going to war with Germany. Hitler actually considered England a possible ally. Another benefit would be that there wouldn't be a high unemployment rate in Europe becasue Hitler worked to make it so everyone can get a job. (If you read Mein Kampf you will know why he had sympathy towards the poor) Basically Winston Churchill is the cause of all the **** in the world.
2006-12-11 00:48:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by LeperMan 1
·
1⤊
4⤋
LeperBoy is on crack...
Where shall I begin???
Adolf Hitler, a WWI veteran from Austria, joined a right-wing extreme nationalist party called German Worker's Party. When he became leader of that party in 1921 he renamed it the National Socialist German Worker's Party...we all like to call it the Nazi Party. Hitler was arrested and sent to jail after a failed uprising at Beer Hall Putsch. While he was in jail he wrote Leperboys favorite book "Mein Kampf" which in English means My Struggle. The book was basically an autobiographical account of his movement and it underlying ideology...extreme German nationalism, virulent anti-semitim, and anticommunism linked together by a social Darwinian theory of struggle that stresses the right of superior nations to living space...Anyways, for some strange reason, they let this nut job out of jail and he goes and takes over Germany...well, not quite, Hitler bullied President Hindenburg to make him Chancelor of germany and form a new government and then when el presidento died, Hitler then got command of the nation....moving on, Hitler formed a nice little group called Schutzstaffeln or SS for short. This group was in charge of terror and repression...oh isn't that nice?? They were there to insure the "mater race" prevailed. Which means they got to dig big holes and line up the people next to the whole that were Jewish or just plain pissed them off and shoot them in the head so that they would fall forward and then when the whole was full, they just cover it up...such a nice little group....well, when that got to be too time consuming they decided to just gas the jews...at least the ones that were not going to be able to work in their labor camps...which meant all children...btw.
In 1935 Hitler decided to ignore this little treaty call the Treaty of Versailles...yeah, it was this thing that was put in place because Germany was such assholes in WWI (that is the short explanation)...ok, im too tired to keep going, but you kinda get my drift, right?
2006-12-11 03:47:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by divinephi 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Tomas Torquemada. He ran the Inquisition for Isabella and Ferdinand. His was the original racial cleansing.
Oh, Phillip L., maybe you should learn to spell before you go off on another tangent. I doubt this is an original thought by you you seem more to be a parrot.
2006-12-11 10:30:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
well there thousands evil people through out history on both sides of good and evil ,
well since I had to write reports on him every year in grade and middle school it is has to MLK . . just becuse of the reports, every year the same person we had to write on him, no else just MLK for 8 years, so when I had wrote a differ report in the eight grade titled "there were others" off to the princpals office i went and three days suspension. it was worth it, I thought MLK would be proud of me.
2006-12-11 01:18:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by bleacherbrat34 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
St. Patrick for driving the snakes (druids) out of Ireland, Hitler for the order of the mass killin of millions and his apperent lap dog LeperMan for the apperent support of genocide, and overthrow proper governments.
2006-12-11 01:20:22
·
answer #7
·
answered by Recil D 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Adolf Hitler. Everyone knows why... A madman who caused much death and destruction of the Jewish people because he was going to create the perfect race.. Germans with blond hair and blue eyes. I feel he was just plain evil....
2006-12-11 00:31:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Henry the eigth. He was a self centred bigamist who thought he had the right to cause so many deaths. Also Hitler and Stalin for obvous reasons.
2006-12-11 15:25:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Princess 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
To me, it's not a matter of hate, but more a case of "What part of history would I like to change."
There are the usual suspects, though: Nero, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Amin.
2006-12-11 00:32:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think there are several qualified candidates: Hitler, Stalin, Hussein, Milosevic, but you can add other names of characters that have committed genocide and crimes against humanity.
2006-12-11 00:29:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by Ivan 5
·
0⤊
0⤋