If scientists attempt to disprove God via the big bang theory-how?(the two things that conjoined were made by?

Answer 1

Well, the concept of "God" is an article of FAITH. By definition, "faith" is the concept of believing in things that cannot be seen, proved, etc. So, your idea of "disprove God" makes as much sense as "the smell of the color purple."

Second, believers will ask who made the materials that created the "Big Bang". They will ask who provided the energy for the big bang. And they'll challenge the notion that everything in the universe is the result of random, one-in-a-billion mutations that somehow take hold.

Third, most people who believe in God ultimately believe because they have some sort of experience where they believe that they've been in contact with God. The "God belief" doesn't exist due to shared delusion or urban legend or a sense of fear. The history of the world is filled with religions that died out because people didn't find the beliefs matched what they experienced in their lives.

fourth -- what does this have to do with "words and word play"? Could you please post in the proper areas?

Answer 2

It is odd, isn't it, that it would seem as though evolution and creation are mutually exclusive when it is quite possible that both could be true simultaneously. However, inasmuch as science can explain the developmental process of a species, it cannot disprove what it cannot measure and therefore often factors out God altogether.

Answer 3

The big bang does not disprove God. It merely shows, by reproducible observation, the the literalists' Biblical account of Creation taking place 6,000 years ago is wrong.