Can the "SELF" be farthest than any STAR in the observable Universe?

Question

why do you think so?

Answer 1

Wait, I'll ask G. K. Chesterton.

Gilbert Keith Chesterton (1874-1936) is the poet who asked the question. According to Wiki, he was known as the prince of paradox.

The entire quote is:
One may understand the cosmos, but never the ego; the self is more distant than any star.

The distance is meant (I guess) as the difference between knowledge and the object of the knowledge. You have a better chance of understanding the universe (including the farthest star) than of understanding yourself.

Answer 2

Before we can compare people to stars,
it's necessary to grasp certain principles
of creation.

Existence is a mixture of energy
and frequencies, that interface with
invisible forces we call Laws Of
Physics. This pertains to both stars
and people.

Energy has two basic stages:
Quantum (Black Hole ) and Particle.

When energy collapses to a quantum
stage, it forms a void. When energy
explodes from a void, it spins into a
state of time and space. Thus, what
used to be a universe is now a huge
genetic field that recycles energy.

There is a theory today that suggests
the possibility of people taking a quantum
leap through zillions of light years in the
blink of an eye. However, if we can do this,
so can the stars, or any other energy
form.

Answer 3

If your asking is there could be something living outside of what we can see, it's possible and maybe one day we'll find out. We could be a small part of a living thing.

Answer 4

What?