English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-10 13:44:21 · 6 answers · asked by zach c 1 in Politics & Government Government

In terms of control, balance of power, practicality, stability, and overall performance.

2006-12-10 14:14:02 · update #1

6 answers

The Athenian Democracy was apure democracy. Everyone gathered in the square to VOTE on anything and everything. Sure you had a vote but how would you like to attempt to get together for EVERY Decision that is made and count that many hands in the air. IT COULD NOT be done in a government as large as ours. In the Roman Republic there was NO VOTE on most matters. The minor details were votable. If you were a Roman Citizen you had SOME RIGHTS otherwise forget it! The dictator was able to execute almost anyone that he chose without question. Neither of these would be a GOOD CHOICE for the USA today. George Washington could have been the first "King" in our country if he had chosen to do so. He did not. I believe that what we have is NOT NEARLY PERFECT but it is THE BEST Democracy that has ever been to this date!! Have a great holiday!
Eds

2006-12-10 14:44:34 · answer #1 · answered by Eds 7 · 0 0

Roman Republic.

2006-12-10 13:48:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Roman Republic!!

2006-12-10 13:47:50 · answer #3 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 0 0

I prefer the Athenian democracy, and the Greeks to the Romans. The Romans tried to copy the Greeks' originality and art, and philosophy. However, the Greeks were very much ahead of their time.

2006-12-10 13:47:28 · answer #4 · answered by Rhonda 7 · 1 0

Not each and every citizen can burn their country wide flag in protest in opposition to the unsatifactory state of presidency that's in energy and now not confronted a few variety of authorized penalties,that is mainly essentially the most precise factor approximately american democracy,being in a position to oppose something you consider like opposing,however democracy is a b-itch whilst it now not to your aspect,consider that being in a position to oppose doesn't suggest imposing and realising it the way in which a man or woman favored. Too a lot democracy might truthfully result in anarchy or semi or partial state of anarchy. Good insurance policies might not be in a position to peer end result due to the fact of red meat barrel advantages present via politicians to sway citizens. If a central authority is believe to care for its pple like the way in which mum and dad care for their youngsters,then probably wellknown consensus is the final factor to involved approximately due to the fact there are occasions whilst mum and dad prevent giving into the needs in their baby now not due to the fact they can not have the funds for to however they realize higher. Good insurance policies as a rule take an extended time to peer outcome. To achieve a factor wherein the basis is violated is whilst a organization that's opposing makes a decision to make use of deadly drive or crook acts to stifle competition voices in opposition to them. It continuously elaborate to welcome alterations for so much pple simply as it is usually similarly elaborate folks who suggest to foresee the in poor health results of such alterations within the some distance long run however so much could continuously pick the simpler manner out although it would possibly not the correct manner.

2016-09-03 08:42:17 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

zach c Is this about you!??
☆★☆ http://www.osoq.com/funstuff/extra/extra02.asp?strName=zach_c

2006-12-10 13:55:49 · answer #6 · answered by add e 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers