good question. On one side he wasn't near the ball. the other, that was clearly some agressive behaviour from lehmann. But seeing that it was Arsenal and Chelsea there was no way the ref would give a call in favour of any of the sides. If this happened between Chelsea and Watford. Hell yeah, he would get the penalty.
2006-12-10 14:48:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by toonmili 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i'm a Chelsea fan, performed football all my life and nonetheless do. and that i continually idea triumphing consequences isn't extremely triumphing. it really is in common words ending a sport and taking the coronary heart out of it. i'd imagine this if Chelsea received with consequences and they have received video games like that. How do you play adverse to the perfect communities interior the international, have a collection level then bypass right into a 2 leg playoff and interior the finest end it in a shootout. the game must have kept playing till eventually a golden objective. After the first 2 overtimes then the communities might want to were allowed 3 subs in the journey that they want. also, they ought to apply cameras examine the calls or no calls to get them perfect, a twin of the NFL yet no longer to intrude with the game. those video games are quite significant and could no longer be determined by a ignored call or unsuitable call. The referees can no longer see each and every thing and technologies should be on their area.
2016-11-25 19:41:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by valesquez 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
lol no. lehmman was just trying to get drogba to continue with the play. and u can see from the tv replays that drogba fell in such a theatrical way after lehmman gave him a pat on the back.such a big sized person like drogba can't possibly fall from such a light push, push me that and i won't fall also. and btw, the reaction from drogba was hilarious.
2006-12-10 15:56:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know, but I thought the whole incident was hilarious!
Even Arsene Wenger described it a 'comedy'. Both players were exaggerating so I couldn't care less. But no, Drogba didn't have the ball then, so no penalty even if lehman had beaten him to a pulp.
2006-12-10 15:33:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Samantha 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
nope,because lehmann being pushed by drogba because lehmann push drogba and lehmann push drogba because Drogba curious his penalty appeal rejected by the ref
2006-12-10 18:53:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by luke s 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do not think so, Drogba has a bad reputation falling
2006-12-10 13:48:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by pelancha 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
look it was a great match today but the luck didnt play with chelsea i am sad about lambard last ball shot
2006-12-10 13:29:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by micho 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no.cos the refree was behind arsenal.didnt u see Senderos's foul on Drogba.it was a penalty.no doubt.everone knows it.
but the refree... .
COME ON CHELSEA
2006-12-10 17:33:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by TrueBlue 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why..... Drogba didn't even have the ball.... LOL.... no way!!!!!!!!!
2006-12-10 12:40:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
of course not
2006-12-10 23:34:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Melika 3
·
0⤊
0⤋