How long do you think it will take before republicans stop blaming everyone but themselves for their complete failure in every aspect of government?
2006-12-10 10:56:40 · 15 answers · asked by Born of a Broken Man 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
republicans will never admit they are wrong.
They don't care about such things. all that matters to your average republican is their party. nothing is more important than their party, and that includes our great country.
Americans are just starting to realize this.
2006-12-10 11:07:17 · answer #1 · answered by Samurai Jack 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Lol.
You are dreaming. Every election it will start all over again.
This my friend is the price of democracy. I don't know what's wrong with the mentality of your country but you had better get used to the fact that both parties are likely there to stay for some time.
In numbers support for both seems to have been pretty close recently. Not sure how long that will last.
The only thing republicans did was:
1) make it sound like Iraq would be a cake walk, expecting Americans to accept reality AFTER the invasion. Any idiot could have told you that, invading a country where the US is hated might take some time in terms of cleaning up the mess. You would not need to be a journalist or Phd to guess that. Sadly, all the journalists in your country made it sound like a cake walk. I guess they were afraid to do their jobs and be objective.
2) The handling of Katrina had even people from India shocked at the incompetence of the most powerful country in the world. It is understandable that that alone would imply some kind of punishment of the republicans in your midterm elections.
Idealogy wise? It will be back. Count on it. The opposite will too.
2006-12-10 11:09:43 · answer #2 · answered by rostov 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Take a look at the majority of platforms the democrats won the election on: stronger security, lowering the national debt, avoiding issues on guns, religion, etc. Now take a look at the modern day Republican party and what they stand for.
I say that the 2006 election isn't an indication that America has rejected right wing ideology. I think it's an indication that the Republican party has rejected right wing ideology.
2006-12-10 12:20:37 · answer #3 · answered by bennyjoe81 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think they are already. Look at what is going on with the war right now. People are coming out (who are republican) and saying it is not successful.
However, I don't see any change with global warming and I personally take that issue very seriously. I know it has been in the best interest of the current government to ignore it and say that "not all scientist support this THEORY." However, that is not the truth. Do the research and find that out. I dont think that many (which may mainly be republicans) people are willing to admit that they may be wrong on this issue.
They leave it up to the individuals and companies to straighten things out with environmental policies. That just leads to the "all for one" ideology though. Don't you think?
2006-12-10 11:06:44 · answer #4 · answered by tanyarachel 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Americans did not reject Republicanism. They rejected its corruption. Republicans swept into office in 1994. They ran on small government, lower taxes, and less government regulation. They implemented a lot of these policies.
Republicans became fat and happy. Americans voted them out. What they do not know is what the Democrats will do. The best we can hope for is gridlock. Let Newt lead us back in 2008.
2006-12-10 11:54:13 · answer #5 · answered by GOPneedsarealconservative 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
None of us will live long enough to ever see that happen. Remember now, it's all Clinton's fault. Eleven years of a republican congress and six years of absolute republican control of government. Look at the mess they have created. Debt out of control, government intrusion in the lives of everyday Americans, a hopeless war in Iraq, arrogance, intolerance, hypocrisy and corruption. Quite a record of accomplishment. They should be proud.
2006-12-10 11:40:57 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Remember that not all Democrats vote in union so if a bill comes up and some Democrats vote with the republicans then the advantage is gone.
Just food for thought.
2006-12-10 11:01:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think you're wrong about that. Conservatives rejected the Republicans because they are acting more like liberals, thus against their ideology.
2006-12-10 11:00:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
some day human beings will discover out that the two events are basically relaxing the UN mandates that George HW Bush signed onto in 1992. Sustainable progression is meant to equalize all economies globally. that's final analysis, meant to ration each thing to genuinely all of us interior the international. that's what Obama meant by using spreading the wealth. He wasn't fairly conversing approximately human beings. He became into conversing bearing directly to the international. He even call himself a citizen of the international. that's what globalization is all approximately. that's meant to end poverty globally. wealthy international places are going to be punished for their previous over use of supplies. Even this well-being care bill is meant to ration well-being care. that's based on the perception that one and all human beings have the dazzling to well-being care whether that is going to likely be rationed. It won't carry approximately greater helpful or greater decrease priced well-being care. that is going to basically mean that each you could have get entry to to a pair form of well-being care. All commerce is relative to the standards set for environmental concerns. on the same time as we predict of that firms are going distant places in view that's purely too costly right here, they are doing it as a UN mandate because of the fact extreme advance ends up in destruction of the atmosphere and inequality in wealth. Now that's being unfold around regardless of the outcomes of the prosperity on the wealthier international places. there is a lot greater to it. the two events have their area in relaxing those mandates by using final dates set by using the UN. that is all going to be consistent with socialism. Europe is a lot forward human beings and have been utilising socialized drugs and cap and commerce for a on the same time as now. It rather does clarify why neither celebration is what it was to the yankee human beings. Our shape would be deminished as international entities make the regulations for all 178 individuals of the UN. that's the recent international order so struggling with over parisanship is a waste of your skill and mine.
2016-10-18 02:08:46 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Like the war is really about oil? I see blame on both sides and the republicans still have the White Houes.
2006-12-10 11:01:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
????... as far as I can tell it is the Democrats that are always crying about *everything*....
And the main reason that so many Republicans got tossed was because they *DID NOT* follow Conservative Republican ideology
2006-12-10 11:02:12 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋