..for all of his good works across the world :)
2006-12-10 10:39:33 · 45 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes I am being sarcastic!!
2006-12-10 10:42:04 · update #1
I'll refer to him as Geroge Bush.. he aint my President and we are not so obsequious here in the UK towards our leaders!!!
2006-12-10 10:50:10 · update #2
only if the definition of peace is to wage war under false pretenses and maintain a state of unrest in a country we claim to be helping, when actually we're just trying to rape it of it's chief economic source, which, if we succeed, will create another destitute land where people won't have the means to afford to live decently--- nah, that's not peace, that's tyranny, and nears pretty close to fascism
2006-12-10 10:44:50 · answer #1 · answered by alias101 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
If there have been a precise opposite of the Nobel Peace Prize, Bush might actual win it. If he repents of his previous deeds and spends the completed relax of his existence performing outstanding stable deeds there is an probability that he ought to be seen interior the destiny besides the undeniable fact that it quite is extremely unlikely that somebody who has brought about plenty harm so unnecessarily might ever be an truthfully recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize.
2016-10-14 10:20:36 · answer #2 · answered by arleta 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Alfred Bernhard Nobel, the founder of the Peace Prize, is well known for his peace loving enterprises. He invented dynamite in1867 and a smokeless gunpowder two years later. He amassed a large fortune from the manufacture of explosives and the exploitation of the Azerbaijan oilfields. President Bush is an incarnated Alfred, of course he should receive the Prize.
2006-12-11 01:36:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, there is a good chance he will win the Nobel Peace Prize in the future.
He has spent the last 6 years fighting for peace and freedom.
Because of your socialist system, the UK will be made up of Third World Nations in 20 years.
2006-12-10 10:53:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
When El Baradai won it a couple of years ago, wasn't that supposed to be shared with George Bush already?
NB: for those of you who get their news from Fox, you might need a little explanation: El Baradai got the Peace Nobel Prize for his work with the Atomic Agency showing that there was no WMD in Iraq, as Georgie decided to invade anyway...
2006-12-10 10:45:59 · answer #5 · answered by Nic 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How about we create a new award. Let's call it the nobel dunce prize. Bush would win that hands down, lol.
2006-12-10 11:09:24 · answer #6 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No he'll win the Nobel Prizes for: Physics, Chemistry, Physiology/Medicine,Economics and Literature as that is one bright guy!!!
2006-12-10 10:58:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
For Starting 2 wars directly and refusing to take options at his disposal to stop others (1 on 1 talks with North Korea?)
That's not peace. It's war and destruction. He'll never win a Nobel peace prize.
2006-12-10 10:42:57 · answer #8 · answered by The Big Box 6 · 7⤊ 2⤋
no catigory for his winning bid for nobel prize, you did'nt imphasize the category [ his good works across the globe?] it war right no catigory in nobel prize on that, the history of giving prizes is the the man in good faith to help that no pay in returns its noble cause would be
2006-12-10 20:18:23 · answer #9 · answered by mario t. reoyan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HAHAHA!
Satan will give Bush the Nobel War Prize for causing so much destruction of human life!!!
2006-12-10 10:45:03 · answer #10 · answered by Descent 2 · 5⤊ 1⤋