2006-12-10 10:38:35 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ Men's Health
No difference at all. They are all the same procedure.
Now some unbiased information on circumcision....
CIRCUMCISION IS VERY BENEFICIAL, its cleaner and several research bodies have concluded that circumcised men have less risk of contracting STD's such as AIDS-HIV or herpes.
Uncircumcised penises are difficult to keep clean, and more prone to infections and penile cancer, studies have shown.
A circumcised penis is naturally clean and virtually free from urinary infection. You will not have to worry again with careful washing of your penis.
About STD's:
As I said, several studies carried out by prestigious research bodies have concluded that uncircumcised penises are more prone to infections and contraction of STD's, including AIDS-HIV. Circumcised men have been proved to be up to seven times less likely to be infected than those who are uncircumcised. Have a look at this site: http://icuxbridge.icnetwork.co.uk/news/tm_objectid=14095142&method=full&siteid=53340&headline=-circumcision-protects-against-aids--name_page.html
As for women, studies also show that circumcision also protects female partners from AIDS-HIV and other STD's. Browse this article: http://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/Press_releases/2006/02_08_06.html
About sensitivity of a circumcised penis:
No medical or physiological study has proved that circumcision reduces sensitivity, opposed to common belief. It is completely FALSE that circumcision reduces penis sensitivity. The American Academy of Paediatrics (AAP) confirms this on their web site; have a look at: http://www.aap.org/pubed/zzzjzmemh4c.htm
Circumcision is an easy and nowadays *painless* procedure, which has many benefits, and virtually no risks.
Circumcision is NOT an amputation. Circumcision is NOT comparable at all to female circumcision, which is something completely different.
Circumcision rates are INCREASING nowadays, both in the United States and overseas. Many African and South American countries with little circumcision tradition are starting to promote the procedure to help to reduce the AIDS-HIV infection rates.
Finally, this site has a lot of useful and *unbiased* information. Make sure you have a good look: http://www.circinfo.net
2006-12-11 08:10:40 · answer #1 · answered by Scuba 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Jewish and muslims have a religious ritual with the circumcision. Neither of these have to do with health issues. I posted two websites you can read for more info. The circumcision in the hospital is done for health reasons and no religious ritual is usually performed.
2006-12-10 10:49:09 · answer #2 · answered by Squeegee 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
There is no such thing as a "normal" circumcision. They are all sadistic and barbaric. The chopping done in the hospital is done under sterile conditions by a doctor, who gets paid very well for doing this unnecessary surgery. Ritual mutilation may be done by a person trained in the ritual but not in medicine, and the conditions may or may not be clean, let alone sterile, depending on the country you're in. Jewish cirumcisions are done on the 8th day of life. I think Muslim circumcisions are done at puberty, but I'm not 100% sure, and that may vary from sect to sect.
2006-12-10 12:32:59 · answer #3 · answered by Maple 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
the jewish circumcision is done for the same reason cattle ranchers mark a brand upon their steers to identify their cattle.
God told the Jews to put this mark on the penis to show they are God's people and belong to Him.
but of all places - why put the mark on the penis ???
maimonides the rabbinic sage said it was so that the jewish man every day -every time he held his penis. Would get reminded he was part of God's covenent with Israel.
jewish circumcision to me has strong sexual overtones.
maimonides claimed it was done to weaken the power ofthe male organ and to render it weaker so the man would moderate his lust.
So what do U say????
2006-12-10 13:57:04 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
To make a joke
Jewish prompt and circumcision with the whole family to party.
muslim use the scimitar and one wack method
Normal??? A bunch of sickos get drunk and pretend they are barbecuing potato skins.
Another big joke just to get even and preform some medieval mutilation.
2006-12-10 11:03:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
As far as I know there is NO difference. There is a difference in the way they circumcise & using different instruments. There are also different styles, high & tight, low cut, with or without frenulum, etc see - www.circlist.com
I got Reluctantly got circumcised at age 28 due to medical reasons. If I had've the web at the time I might not have got circumcised at all after reading all the anti circ people on the web.
My ex girlfriend at the time was also reluctant for me to get circumcised at the time mainly coz her family all had their foreskins.
Well AFTER both my ex girlfriend & myself were bloody glad I'd got circumcized.
1/ - The pain afterwards ain't THAT bad - 5 weeks later we were having sex.
2/ - NO smegma {Cheesy subtance under the foreskin}
3/ - NO smell - I used to wash & scrub & only 1/2 an hour later I could smell my penis & so could my girlfriend yuck!!!!
4/ - No pubes between the forsekin
5/ no foreskin between the zipper on a pair of jeans
6/ More intense orgasms
7/ - My Ex girlfriend thought my penis felt BIGGER AFTER BEING CIRCED - we thought maybe the less skin makes it feel bigger.
8/ My ex gave me some great blowjobs AFTER being circed coz it didn't smell like it used to.
9/ I'd last longer before ******* AFTER being circed.
10/ - My Ex thought it looks better circed than uncirced.
11/ - pee straight - no foreskin in the way
My only two regrets is not getting circed sooner coz if i'd known all these benefits I would've & not getting circed tighter.
To ALL the anti-circumist's out there - get a life. I've noticed some women commenting being anti - well my reply to you is i've had a foreskin & I am without one now & from MY experience of both it is better without.
For guys with foreskins enjoy what you have if you like it that way. For guys who've been circed & feel they've been mutilated or something - get a life & enjoy your circumcized dick - it ain't THAT bad.
By the way aussiep - pleasure is better coz my dick ain't as moist & sensitive as it was having a foreskin over it so I enjoy both Hand & head jobs more.
2006-12-10 14:58:51 · answer #6 · answered by Chris L 2 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Maybe just the ritual circumstances under which it is performed.
2006-12-10 10:42:55 · answer #7 · answered by Sels 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
religious rituals
2006-12-10 11:14:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They are all violations of the male childs human rights!
Every human being has a right to a body as complete and perfect as G*d or nature gave it to them. No one or group has a right to change that because of their opinions or superstitions.
This basic right applies equally to girls in Africa, Asia, and boys in the U.S.
2006-12-11 03:01:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
they are all cruel & painful & not needed!!
probably spoil extra pleasure for a man
2006-12-10 11:11:21 · answer #10 · answered by ausblue 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋