Does anyone else agrre with me that princess di was nothing but a publicity seeking, gold digging ... whore.
2006-12-10 10:34:31 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
No, she was a poor girl with dificult traumas since she was a little girl, remember that her mother run away with his lover and live in Australia with him, all her chilhood was without her, that is hard to recover, and the married to whom did not love her, and discover it was a crash, after that she made awful mistakes, with men and the worse spoke about her affairs, poor lady and poor childrem of her.
2006-12-10 11:53:48 · answer #1 · answered by pelancha 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Princess Diana was a very sweet, sincere, caring, and kind, loving person. She wanted to make the world a better place and to not be in her husbands shadow. She had a mind of her own that the royal family looked down on. she was supposed to just sit aside and let Prince Charles do what he wanted and not say a thing? (Pretend like it wasn't happening?) Her life was too short, I will never forget her.
2006-12-14 16:53:39 · answer #2 · answered by JBWPLGCSE 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you're insult to a dynamic woman who conquered many fears and to go on to perform worthwhile humanitarian activities is an insult to you.
if she were publicity seeking, she used it to the good of many fine causes. She used her fame to help those in need. Perhaps, that is not how it started out for her, but that is what she did in the end.
What have you've done to better the world?
2006-12-10 20:26:30 · answer #3 · answered by finickymartino 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yah you obviously haven't educated yourself about her.
Read some books about her and what the royal family put her through and you will disagree.
They used her as a sacrificial lamb for an heir to the throne.
The place she died, that tunnel, is a pagan site that was used by pagans to sacrifice to the goddess Diana.
Her death was on purpose... She was murdered because the royal family thought she disgraced them for divorcing Charles and not putting up with his adultry.
2006-12-10 18:40:11 · answer #4 · answered by the nothing 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no,she was only 19 when she married him.I believed she loved him, by the time she realize that another was in the mar rage ,it was to late to call off the big wedding (The tea towels were all ready printed).If she don't love him she wouldn't of cared.He would give up the other ,so hurt was Di ,that she started the game ,using the media to settle her betrayal.
2006-12-10 21:09:20 · answer #5 · answered by colliedogcody 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, there was more to her. And she came money so why would she be that concerned about getting more? She wasn't the commoner turned princess that some spinned her into being.
2006-12-10 18:37:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO, I don't agree with you at all. She was none of that. That may be what Charles turned her into over the years, but she didn't start off like that.
2006-12-10 18:43:07 · answer #7 · answered by Lola 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutly not, but I think you are and I depict some jealously there.
By the way I ****** your mother last night and she moaned like a cow
2006-12-10 21:49:17 · answer #8 · answered by C C 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, don't agree with you at all. I don't see why you think that. I don't understand why people always have mean, hurtful, and negative things to say.
2006-12-11 22:19:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're an a$$wipe.
2006-12-10 23:01:16 · answer #10 · answered by bellegurl17 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋