2006-12-10 10:13:01 · 15 answers · asked by Star 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
When a film is based on a true story, it will always tell you this when they roll the credits at the end of the film. If there is no announcement, then the answer is as in this case NO it is a fictional story. The fact that you found the film so believable is a credit to the film makers.
2006-12-10 10:23:17 · answer #1 · answered by Social Science Lady 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
per a e book. The e book is incredibly diverse then the action picture. The Forrest in the e book is a little extra vulgar and uncooked. this is an exceedingly sturdy study. i think of the author's call is Winston Gloom or some thing like that. not per a real person so a techniques as i comprehend.
2016-12-13 06:26:07 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tom Hanks did all the running shots himself, and they didn't need to base the movement on anyone else.
2006-12-10 10:15:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nah, fraid not.
It was actually Tom Hanks' brother that did all the running for that part of the movie.
2006-12-10 10:17:51 · answer #4 · answered by Hustler 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no way, nobody could have experienced all of the things that Forrest did
2006-12-10 10:15:15 · answer #5 · answered by Soph-a-loph 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. Just a bunch of Hollywood hooey.
2006-12-10 10:14:44 · answer #6 · answered by Jane F 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah the dude from Chariots of Fire
2006-12-10 10:14:39 · answer #7 · answered by Step into the Freezer 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No...no one can ******* run that much...didnt he run for like 2 years or something ridiculous like that? And he just kept running...blah stupid movie...dont take any of it seriuosly/literally
2006-12-10 10:14:50 · answer #8 · answered by Karen Smith 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
nope im afraid it wasnt
2006-12-10 10:55:24 · answer #9 · answered by nintendo8888 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope. it'd be cool if it was true though.
2006-12-10 10:14:26 · answer #10 · answered by mackenzie 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋