Was George Washington pro or anit slavery?

Question

I'm wondering this because I'm doing a paper on Rober E. Lee and on a website it said

"His [Robert E. Lee's] father had been a calvary officer during the American Revolution, and had been a close friend of George Washington."

and I was wondering if I could say it was irionic that his father had been friends with Geroge Washington and had fought for the confederacy.

Answer 1

Of course G. Washington supported slavery. There was no reason not to at the time, he had many slaves himself.

Answer 2

Actually, the Custis' and Lee's were related (Martha Custis Washington).
George Washington, being a Virginia planter and one of the privileged class owned slaves. He included in his will that they be freed upon his death. If it sounds as though he were pro slavery, that is a hasty and unjustified conclusion. GW was a product of his times, 18th Century colonial America. Slavery was not being seriously considered or discussed by any of his contemporaries.
It was simply the way things were.

Answer 3

martha washingtons maiden name was martha custis, which came form the Lee family, i dotn recall exactly how they were realted, cousins or soem such im sure yu can find it on wikipedia. re GW he suppsorted slavery but was considered a "benevolent" master of the time, EG, he treated his slaves with respect and dignity, nto like the southern slave drivers did int he 18th century. really there were two different worlds of slavery, some southern plantations were horrendous in their treatment of slaves while others were more respecatable of thier slaves, this is tno meant to be supportive of slavery by the peole liek GW but one must remember that at that time in hsitory blacks were considered lesser beings, barely human. this WAS genreally a universal perception, so ti was not out of the norm

Answer 4

Washington substitute into disturbed by employing the contradiction between the ideals of the revolution and the continuation of slavery. yet his universal objectives have been to nurture the Union and build a stable Federal government (he believed in a stable federal sovereignty in assessment to Jefferson). on the grounds that he felt the slavery subject could harm the Union he favourite putting off the slavery subject for no less than a technology (twenty years). in my opinion he taken care of his slaves ok. while he left the Presidency he had approximately 3 hundred slaves yet in basic terms one hundred have been mandatory for the artwork he had. He stored the others because of the fact he had a strict rule to on no account spoil up families while advertising slaves. He additionally had a slave serving as a private aide and Washington remained unswerving to him for some years, treating him ok. do no longer' misunderstand, Washington owned slaves and had no stable convictions against slavery. He did help a steady end to slavery yet did no longer think of the time substitute into precise for the period of his presidency, nor did he evaluate it a precedence. As he have been given older he believed greater strongly against slavery yet stored additionally observing his monetary subject and their value substitute right into a huge area of his wealth. He additionally did no longer own all of the slaves, many belonged to the valuables of his spouse's first husband which he controlled for his spouse. Others he leased from different planters so it substitute into no longer in his potential to unfastened them.

Answer 5

He owned slaves but freed them and gave them land in his will, so he must have had some misgivings about slavery. The decedents of his slaves still lived and owned farms near Mt Vernon in 1960.

Answer 6

Anti, but he owed some to support himself

Answer 7

i think he was both. i would look into it but i remember he owned some slaves. but he was anti because he help free them

Answer 8

i thought he was for slavery

Answer 9

he owned slaves. what does that tell you