Have you ever listened to Rush Limbaugh? He starts each day with a 20 minute tirade against one of the Clinton's. Rightys, listen every day, they come in here and spew the same hate, sometimes word for word. Can you imagine how dumb you have to be to listen to him in the first place, but gullible enough to believe him. But that is your answer on why they cannot defend their president, without blaming Bill Clinton, the last legally elected president and also the most effective at running the business of running the country in over 40 years.
2006-12-10 09:44:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Because they can't stand the way the press stood around like a bunch of "see no evil monkeys" while Clinton was president. Look at the way they cover Bush in comparison. Did the RAPE of Juanita Broderick get any coverage? Compare the way they handled the fact that Bill Clinton was a straight up draft dodger who fled to England with how they've handled the fact that George Bush was "only" in the National guard.
2006-12-10 09:59:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Michael 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why talk about Clinton?
Because in the past 25 years, he's been the only Democrat in the Presidency. And even liberals don't want to bring up the Carter Presidency.
Not only that, Clinton's only been out of office 6 years, so many of his policies are still in effect and we are still feeling the effects of them.
2006-12-10 09:50:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by jerry 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because President Clinton was an extremely weak leader in foreign affairs. He tended more to the problems at home, instead of looking into the foreseeable destructive issues of the future. By doing this he rode the wave of the technological explosion in this country at the time, making him a hero. He did lots of great things and many bad. It's our duty as Americans to pick the right man for the job, and at the time he was it.
2006-12-10 09:49:25
·
answer #4
·
answered by Chesty 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's a lot like how the liberals like to bash Bush b/c they are confused about the war in Iraq and have nothing else to resort to either. And why do you care about Clinton? Do you know him? Maybe they resort to bashing Clinton b/c liberals are still clinging to him like c u m on Monica's dress.
And maybe he should have attended to those "other matters" instead of putting himself in a position to be drug out on a scandal.
**I'm middle class and don't remember being asked if I lived better under Clinton. Your sucking up the CNN BS. I remember being in the military in Japan completely embarassed by the way the Japanese would tease us about the president getting his in the Oval office. And I didn't notice any impact in my wallet until Bush's tax cut.
2006-12-10 09:48:44
·
answer #5
·
answered by BrutalBaby 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
might desire to that is because of the fact the Cons are ill and bored with the double huge-unfold that has been utilized to President Bush? I advise look at it, every time the Dems pass wild approximately some thing that they think of Bush is doing which would be "unlawful" they have a tendency to overlook the Clinton already did the comparable component.....choose examples? The Libby component, what number crooks did Clinton pardon the previous couple of hours he grow to be President? The firing of the Federal Prosecutors, what number did Clinton hearth? The declare of "Bush lies to get us in Iraq", come on, do your homework, Clinton grow to be asserting the comparable component approximately Iraq long earlier Bush grow to be around the White homestead.
2016-12-13 06:23:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hi Insightful,
It all goes back to their basic right wing training as taught by the infamous, " Lush Rimbaugh", better known as the prescription drug addict, in teaching his sculls full of mush students.
They are taught to, " Lie, Deny, Accuse, and name call." and that is about the extent of any argument you will ever get from a conservative right wing repub. And as for the shrub, there is no defense.
Good question,
Darryl S.
2006-12-10 09:52:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Why do liberals talk about Bush whenever they can't find a way to say anything substantive about anything at all?
A BJ takes "like 12 minutes at most", huh? You're 19 years old, right?
BTW, it wasn't the BJ that got White Trash Billy's tit in the wringer - it was lying to a Grand Jury.
And if you think he should've gotten a pass for lying to the Grand Jury would you also suggest that YOU should get a pass under the same circumstances? If yes, then you're a moron. If no, then you seem to think that the Fat Boy's real name is King Billy and that the laws that apply to the rest of us don't apply to him. Either way, he's a lying piece of sh!t who earned his way to ALL of his ethical problems.
Neat, huh?
2006-12-10 09:43:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
Yes. Isn't it funny how they always change the subject to come back to that? Talk about dodging the current issues.
2006-12-10 09:58:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Jeddaknight 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Clinton didn't have any other matters to attend to.
It was 8 years of fun & games. He never was a real president.
2006-12-10 09:40:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋