2006-12-10 09:25:31 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
He broke international law by starting an illegal war. He should be put in front of a war crimes tribunal in the Hague, just like Milosevic.
Whether or not the war is illegal in the US is irrelevant - the Bosnian genocide was legal under Serbian law. That didn't stop Milosevic being a war criminal.
2006-12-10 09:30:26 · answer #1 · answered by Mordent 7 · 4⤊ 5⤋
No, I do not believe that Bush should be impeached, as the War in Iraq is not illegal. It was approved by Congress. Do your research. It's stated right in the Constitution. Here's a philosophy that Liberals are incapable of comprehending: "Support your damn President."
2006-12-10 17:33:07 · answer #2 · answered by ☠Skull Cleaner☠ 5 · 5⤊ 4⤋
Just because he makes people's tummies hurt is not a good enough reason to impeach him
2006-12-10 17:47:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
Asking the same question over and over won't change the facts of a situation. No.
2006-12-10 17:46:30 · answer #4 · answered by Rich B 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No and opinions are not a reason to impeach.
2006-12-10 17:29:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Want to,,,YES. Do it,,,NO.This is a time of war.Albeit a Republican war, it is still that.America will always be under attack.From within and without.Do you pay an American bank or the trans national?
2006-12-10 17:40:10 · answer #6 · answered by stratoframe 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Absolutly NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! President Bush is doing a very good job being president....I wish that he could run again! And FYI the war was not illegal.......it was approved by congress. BUSH ROX MY SOX!!!!!
2006-12-10 17:36:30 · answer #7 · answered by em<3 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Don't be silly. No grounds. Disagreement is what elections are for.
2006-12-10 18:46:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but only if Cheney is impeached too -- he would be a terrible successor.
2006-12-10 17:34:50 · answer #9 · answered by Chuck N 6 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Yes, of course. He's not doing his job. He doesn't represent the American people, he works against their safety and spends all their money doing so.
2006-12-10 17:49:13 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋