2006-12-10 08:54:23 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Let us be clear about this. Bush is a war criminal. Whether he is or not brought to book is another matter. If he shagged his intern, there would be a lot of noise like Clinton's, but when he drops cluster bombs on thousands, he is a good President.
The fact that a thief or a rapist has not been arrested does not mean that they are not criminals.
2006-12-10 09:01:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Don't you Democrats/Liberal have nothing better to do that to talk nonsense about Mr. Bush. Don't you think that we the American people have more problems than to be worrying about impeachment of Mr. Bush, do you think that to impeach a president is that easy and is going to be done in a day or a month or even in a year. Do you really know what impeachment is. If you don't you should find out. Good luck..
2006-12-10 09:07:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Absolutely not!!! Bush Rocks and he did absolutely nothing to be impeached! And, Robespier, how is he a war criminal? The war was approved by congress..it was not illegal. You liberals need to stop being so stupid and do some research! No offense :), but Bush is doing an excellent job...AND when he first got elected as President he had to fix all of Clinton's stupid mistakes as a crappy president so he is doing a DARN GOOD job as president!
2006-12-10 09:45:31 · answer #3 · answered by em<3 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
NO
Impeachment does not unify a country - it divides it. Democrats should not even attempt to impeach President Bush because it will only be bad for the country.
NOT TO MENTION HE DID NOTHING TO BE IMPEACHED!
2006-12-10 09:37:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
all of us understand that regrettably for each good individual born there will be merely a sprint of extra stupid people born. They shelter that moron to no end. it somewhat is unquestionably magnificent to observe. i'm enormously confident technology will use the years that W. has the optimal workplace as a kind in to come to a decision why rules could desire to be surpassed that ward off those with very low I.Q.'s from vote casting. i'm unsure what we could desire to continually do to get him out of workplace even with the undeniable fact that, i'm torn by using fact our u . s . is hurting, yet on the different hand leaving him in workplace will very practically assure that the bush relatives would be complete for solid. A plus could be that the occasion that ran on the "ethical severe floor" seems to be the main sleazeball in cutting-edge memory, and distinctive republican leaders will merely be pushed out on a rail. i'm a tad biased against republicans for sure, yet this administration is embarrassing to even top leaning centrist, and distinctive republicans.
2016-12-30 05:41:58 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Shouldn't there have been an impeachable offense first? You can't just impeach someone because you don't like their politics.
2006-12-10 08:58:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
yes, he should have been impeached for bid rigging. its an unethical business tactic. this is the only thing that i can see that the man has done wrong.
2006-12-10 09:09:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
No. He hasn't committed any impeachable offense
2006-12-10 08:59:12 · answer #8 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
As much as I dislike he has not committed any impeachable offenses
2006-12-10 08:59:03 · answer #9 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Yes. He should have. If he was a Democrat he would have been by now.
2006-12-10 09:00:33 · answer #10 · answered by JS 3 · 2⤊ 5⤋