English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

fires cannot melt steel, yet the us gov want us to believe that it can .

2006-12-10 07:44:59 · 8 answers · asked by demoman 2 in News & Events Current Events

8 answers

It is obvious
The three buildings, the two towers, the north and south tower and building 7 were brought down by means of a controlled demolition. How do i know...........
because i am doing a metal project where i need to bend 1/2 radius carbon steel and to think that i can do it using jet fuel is a bit of a fantasy.
i have to use an oxyacyletine rosebud. if you think you know better, that plastic, paper, jet fuel can burn hotter and let me burn my 1/2' carbon steel plate .....show me how to do it. I am a peer-reviewed-kind-guy. I dont expect anyone to tell me things like your pot melted while you were cooking on a kerosene stove. I want you to show me how it happened.
So far asking the same question in various places have produced no result.. I cannot find anyone to show me.

2006-12-12 09:00:20 · answer #1 · answered by julio_n_ikko 1 · 1 0

Good question....and how did building 7 get pulverized into dust?
These buildings were "superstructures" built in the 70's !
Specifically designed to withstand these kinds of impacts.

You are correct...no fire can melt steal. It has to be assisted by something such as an oxygen/acetylene torch or...well....

Here's a theory...Marvin Bush planted 2 tons of C-4 in the twin towers while he was supposed to be doing a "cable upgrade"

Think about this....Law proffessors say it would have taken a year for a team of the best lawyers to come up with and write the "U.S. Patriot Act." However after the attacks the Bush Administration magically produced this "Act" in a couple of weeks. Give me a break. What are these people thinking? That they are going to scare the people into a "New World Order" ?
Through war and terrorism?

No no no...this is not the answer and I'll tell you right now it's never going to work.

Keep asking these questions....

God Bless America.

2006-12-10 08:37:33 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Another guy who didn't pay attention in science class and who knows absolutely nothing about making steel ... and who never saw any of the many documentaries about the collapse of the Twin Towers and the effect that the heat created by the burning jet fuel had on the structural steel. You better give the steel mills a call and tell them to turn off their blast furnaces. Apparently, according to you, they don't need the heat the furnaces generate to melt steel anymore! Earth to Kenrickt5 ... Earth to Kenrickt5 ... Come in Kenrickt ... Are you there?

2006-12-10 07:56:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

What on earth are you on?
How else do you think steel is smelted...?
To raise the temperature of a fire you need to blow air at the flames....the height the planes hit the towers would allow a good enough air flow to constantly keep the temperature high enough to smelt the steel structure.
As for the steel on the 7 basement floors below...try holding a metre long metal pipe over a naked flame then grabbing the other end.
For god sake will you people stop spreading this conspiracy theory sh1t...have you not bot a life.

2006-12-10 07:56:51 · answer #4 · answered by blissman 5 · 1 2

the attack on the twin towers was planned by the american goverment - the sole reason was to go ahead with the war in iraq.

if you watch the tape of the twin towers going down, notice how they fell in a controled manner, like when u demolish an empty tower block.

surely if it was an unplanned attack and the sole cause of the building to fall was the plane going into it, the towers would have bent.

if this event did not happen, how could the war be justified???

and if people think that their own goverment would not sacrifice their own people think again, the world was outraged, sickned and seeking revenge for daring to attack america, when these emotions take over you will agree to anything except listening to common sense.

goverment officials who were against the war have either killed themselves, went missing been found dead, or discredited - shame we didnt listen to them b4hand

http://infowars.net/articles/August2006/210806Explosives.htm

http://www.wingtv.net/thorn2006/911evilkaminski.html

2006-12-10 09:06:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Remember that high pressure and intense heat together can turn steel into molten.

If you believe the government had a conspiracy to bring the towers down, you got to ask yourself why? It was an incredible attack under conditions that we have never seen before, the physics of what brought those towers down can appear peculiar, but we have nothing to compare it with, nothing like that had ever happened before, therefore "strange" facts will surface.

mrben

2006-12-10 07:51:04 · answer #6 · answered by mrben 2 · 0 2

Too much pressure and heat for any metal to remain solid!

2006-12-13 18:55:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

right
not everyone knows how to make a
good and convincing excuse or story
such things need experts

2006-12-10 07:54:50 · answer #8 · answered by HG 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers