2006-12-10 07:38:22 · 7 answers · asked by Lita 2 in Travel ➔ Germany ➔ Other - Germany
Well - it depends of course of your taste. If you are into old churches, into shopping and into nightlife - go for cologne, it beats brussels in these topics. But if you just want to walk around the city, sit in cafés and visit very diverse sights (especially art noveau architecture), then brussels is your city.
I - as a german - prefer brussels to walk around and have a drink - and the grand marketplace is one of the most beautiful places of the world. But the nightlife isn't as exciting and diverse as the one in cologne - and of course the cologne cathedral is a must-see also. But the whole inner city is rather ugly, but filled with stores of every kind.
It's up to you.
2006-12-10 08:30:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hello, I am living in Cologne, and I suggest go to Brussels. Cologne is not really Germany's most beautiful city, it's very grey (cos destroyed).
It indeed has just the cathedral.
Brussels is nicer to walk around, make sure to get a waffle!!!
2006-12-10 08:31:32 · answer #2 · answered by Felix 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cologne does not have ONLY the cathedral. It has the rhinewalk, it has the chocolate museum (I suggest you to go there!!! ;o))
And a lot more. I can not compare it to Brussels, cuz I've never been in Brussels. All I can say is, that Cologne is worthy to go and see it!!!
2006-12-11 08:30:29 · answer #3 · answered by pearl_682 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cologne, you have to see the cathedral and the shopping is great, and so is the night life. Brussels is boring.
2006-12-10 10:57:24 · answer #4 · answered by Mightymo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I highly recommend Cologne (Koln as the Germans spell it). Brussels has lots to see but is very exspensive and found them not to be very friendly towards english speaking tourist, much like Paris.
2006-12-14 01:42:14 · answer #5 · answered by shovelkicker 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
cologne only has the big catherdral and some art galleries, brussels is more colorful and lots more to see and do
2006-12-10 07:42:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
maximum folk have in uncomplicated terms questions approximately who or what they are, in spite of what they freely document. different than in advertising and marketing, politics and faith, existence proceeds as a gentle continuum of ever changing interpretations and judgements in keeping with environment and custom. Society actual makes a decision who's gay and who's at present with the help of a chain of diffused mechanisms. in any respect circumstances maximum all of us is doubtlessly gay or at present in any given 2d. in spite of truthfully gender, a various and evolving degree of masculine and female features in the two physique and character exists between human beings of all cultures. oftentimes the actual characteristic and the character trait to not coincide, as there are some very boyish at present women and a few very girlish at present adult men, it is going to be blanketed that different than for the pass gendered there are very at present performing gays and lesbians as nicely. gay, at present or Bi are all labels that are used to incite delight or shame - to the two empower or to harm human beings based their modern recommendations or modern strikes. it quite is a shame we live in a society it is so overly obsessed labels and classifications. Alfred Korzybski reported: "The map isn't the territory." i'm rather specific the comparable theory might prepare to the word 'the label isn't the guy'
2016-10-14 10:06:37 · answer #7 · answered by shakita 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋