2006-12-10 07:38:03 · 19 answers · asked by demoman 2 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Watch 'Loose Change' on GOOGLE VIDEO. This will convince millions that there were bombs planted in the towers (including tower 7) days or weeks before. That is how they found traces of body parts on other buildings; it expoded sideways - it didn't colapsed downwards.
If fire caused the towers to collapsed, then I am the pope.
2006-12-10 07:46:41 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Me, watch , IN PLANE SIGHT " The Power Hour" and 911 Loose Change Second Edition, some of it is far fetched but some simple questions like " where is the video evidence of the "plane" actually hitting the Pentagon gone ? and how come a US air force officer who oversaw and planed a simulation of an attack by aircraft on the Pentagon for the US air force, then left the air force and about a year later was supposed to be flying one of the hijacked planes ? What a coincidence !!!
2006-12-13 06:56:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't, although it is possible. Most of the evidence to support these conspiracy theories is brought by people who know little about engineering and refuse to accept/explore other possible scenerios. Now if several engineers were making these accusations with explanations of why fires couldn't have brought the buildings down with proof using a recreation of the events on a smaller scale than I might be more inclined to believe it. Unlike someone who said it is disrespectful to explore these theories, I think that it is respectful because the reason why so many people tradegically died should be explored for possible mistakes and other possibilities of why they died.
2006-12-10 08:38:36 · answer #3 · answered by Nobody Special 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
They were brought down by fires from the jets that crashed into the towers. I saw it on TV myself, and I knew people that died in the building and in two of the jets that day. The evidence that Al QUeda is responsible is VERY evident. Bin Laden and his gang ar responsible.
The buildings were built to withstand 707 jet crashes, much smaller than the fully loaded planes flown into them. The intense fire melted the steel structure (which common sense tells you was forged in an intense fire and which would similarly soften and ultimatelymelt in a fire). A floor of weakened columns could not hold up the dozens of floors above it. I am an engineer and KNOW this to be true. It was impossible to the building to stand with the fire raging so long.
Those that say otherwise are perpetuating a myth for their own warped purposes. It DISHONORS THE MEMORY OF THOSE THAT DIED. Leave the country immediately, you are not fit to be Americans.
2006-12-10 07:47:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
It was Bratz dolls that brought them down as they make a move to take over the social attitude of the entire world.
2006-12-11 00:04:55 · answer #5 · answered by Lord of the Sovereign Ring 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do you have to discuss this topic of a very tragic incident. They should of never been brought down at all, it was an act of evil and we all over the world should remember that day 9/11 in our own quiet thoughts. How can you be so cruel to ask such a stupid question when everyone knows how they was brought down. It was publicised enough by a large media coverage.
2006-12-10 07:51:15 · answer #6 · answered by CT 6 · 5⤊ 3⤋
No I believe they came down because a couple of idiots with half baked and idiotic ideas about Islam decided to fly planes into them.
2006-12-10 07:52:23 · answer #7 · answered by Hendo 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
why were they not able to recover the bodies of the dead, but were able to recover paperbased information!!! it dont make sense!
america -it is time u woke up!
it amazes me that some of you have been so used to been brainwashed u cant see the truth even when it is your own fellow men who have died, it disrespects their memory if u continue to support the goverments lie!
the vengence u seek was never in iraq, it was right on your own doorstep!
2006-12-10 09:36:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
They were brought down by Muslim terrorist. How the collapsed is irrelevant.
2006-12-12 07:57:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
actually i believe that it was a combination of impact, fire and pressure. The impact weakened the structure, although it easily could withstand a plane crash, of course the fire from the plane fuel also severely weakened the structure more, and tthe fact that the top half of the towers weighs a whole lot, didn't help it keep standing, it could no longer support the weight.
2006-12-10 07:41:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 6⤋