North Korean aggressions were the main cause but underlying causes were the US leaving South Korea out of the list of countries it would defend with force. This prompted Kim el Song to think that he could unite Korea without interference from the Unitied States and led to his decision to invade South Korea.
2006-12-10 07:34:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There have been claims that Syngman Rhee manufactured a border incident because he was worried that the US might withdraw and leave him without support. Hugh Deane's book The Korean War, 1945-1953 (San Francisco: China Books and Periodicals, Inc., 1999) includes reference to attacks by the South on the North, and it is said that Syngman Rhee provoked the war by boasting that he was going to attack North Korea (see reference).
Like many cold war conflict zones, it was almost inevitable that Korea would be caught up in a proxy war between the US and the USSR. The balance of blame probably lies with Kim Il Sung, but there were no innocent parties - except for the poor Koreans caught in the middle, of course.
2006-12-10 22:05:57
·
answer #2
·
answered by Phil F 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Korean War, 1950–53
The Korean War was the time when the Cold War became a global conflict.
In 1945, Korea was freed from the Japanese. US troops stayed
in Korea until 1946. The country was split in half at the 38th parallel:
North Korea (led by Kim Il Sung) was Communist.
South Korea (led by Syngman Rhee) was capitalist.
What caused it?
1. President Truman was interested in the Far East:
Domino theory: Europe was not the only place where Communists were coming to power. In the Far East, too, they were getting powerful – China turned Communist in 1949. Truman believed that, if one country fell to Communism, then others would follow, like a line of dominoes. He was worried that, if Korea fell, the Communists would capture Japan.
For more try www.multied.com/korea/causes.html or
www.johndclare.net/cold_war10.html or
just google"causes of the korean war"
2006-12-10 07:40:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by BARROWMAN 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Basically, yes. After the collapse of the Japanese Co Prosperity Sphere in 1945 at the end of WWII, there was a vacuum in Korea. Remember the Japanese enslaved thousands of male and female Korean civilians. The men worked on the railways, the women worked as unpaid prostitutes for the Japanese Armed Services. Communism spread from China to North Korea. The Americans and later the United Nations guaranteed the integrity of pro western South Korea. The North invaded the South and the war started. Check out Wikepedia and The Hisory Channel for extensive information.
2006-12-10 07:36:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
because of the fact it replaced into at a mild disadvantage interior the atomic stability of energy. The U.S. Had ultimate had the bomb because of the fact 1948 and the assumption of atomic war replaced into as quickly as new and unfavourable, so as that they performed it unhazardous. The North's victory could have been the end results of tanks and weapons from the U.S. although, it incredibly is the place they have been made. Kim Il Sung took day with out artwork from being a Communist partisan to take administration training interior the Soviet Union. The concept of Communist Korea replaced into already there in the previous than the eastern have been defeated. China did help North Korea, and that i evaluate Mao under no circumstances extremely forgot having to try this. Having to do Stalin's grimy artwork. although on the different hand if the North had gained ideal away, Korea might have been a united statesa. satellite tv for pc state, after China's intervention it would desire to have been a China satellite tv for pc state (which the North is) it incredibly is been rumored that a dozen or so Soviet pilots, who have been sent to teach the chinese language and DPRK to fly MiG-15's, secretly robotically flew missions interior the MiG's. It exhibits incredibly Stalin's craft that Russia stayed out. What use replaced into Korea to the US? no longer a good purchase. If it would desire to be taken very incredibly, spectacular, even though it wasn't worth a super attempt. No significant long-term aims. the u . s . and u . s . have the two made undesirable blunders and pointless interventions, Korea replaced into as quickly as one in all them. If the North had in simple terms gained appropriate away, Korea could be like China or Vietnam at latest. you do no longer hear plenty airborne dirt and dust interior the advice approximately Vietnam or China. it incredibly is being at war that makes a central authority pass annoying-line.
2016-10-05 03:22:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
All North Korea's fault - not so. Although it was NK's desire to unify Korea, it was due to America's political and military stance towards South East Asia that conflict errupted.
Japan had effectively occupied Korea since 1904. In the waning days of World War II, an agreement was reached between the United States and the Soviet Union: the Soviets would occupy South Korea only as far as the 38th parallel. The United States forces that arrived in Korea were wholly unprepared for their duties in Korea, not understanding its history and relationship with Japan. To many Koreans, independence and unification were their most important goals.
The United States, after much fumbling, supported Syngman Rhee, a Korean nationalist who had been exiled to the United States in 1907. The United States asked the United Nations to settle the issue of a divided Korea. Despite Soviet objections, a United Nations commission voted for elections in Korea. The communists in the South boycotted the election, and refused to allow it in the North. In the South, conservative parties allied with Rhee received a majority of the vote, in an election in which 80% of eligible Korean voters took part. Rhee became President of the newly-declared independent South Korea in October 1948. The Soviets installed Kim el Song as the leader of the North.
As the United States drew down its military in the post war period, the American garrison of 40,000 quickly withered to a force of 472 officers and men who made up the Korean Military Advisory Group (KMAG). The Korean army, known as ROK, was given only light weapons. The North Korean Army, on the other hand, was heavily equipped with tanks and other armored vehicles. The communist victory in China, combined with the first Soviet nuclear tests in 1949, resulted in a new US policy of containment in Asia. The policy, called NSC 48/2, called for the containment to be primarily non-military, with economic and military aid given to non-communist regimes in Asia.
On January 5, 1950, Secretary of State Dean Acheson, speaking at the National Press Club, articulated the American policy. He spoke of those countries that the US would defend with force: Japan, the Rykus islands and the Philippine Islands. Korea was left out. The withdrawal of the last American forces from Korea, as well as North Korean Kim's conviction that the US would not intervene, convinced the North Koreans to attempt to unify the country by force. The Soviets, led by Stalin, and the Chinese, led by Mao, concurred with both Kim's judgement about the United States and his plans to unify the country by force. In June, he struck.
2006-12-10 23:23:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes they crossed the 38 parallel and that started the Korean war and a state of war still exist an armistice has never been signed but hostilities ended july 53 with many millions dead
2006-12-11 18:59:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by srracvuee 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
After WW2, America did not want Korea to become a Communist state, and over course the U.S.S.R. and China supported communism in the Korean peninsula.
2006-12-10 07:31:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by llcoolj38 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes they started it and it was fought to a standstill by most of the then British Empire troops and America. an mostly unknown fact is it has never been declared over and in fact that we are still officialy at war talks still go on all the time
2006-12-11 04:56:39
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was a proxy war between the US on one side, and China and Russia on the other.
2006-12-10 10:50:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by imprology 2
·
0⤊
0⤋