2006-12-10 06:26:12 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I believe the government had a lot to do with it. I found a video (below) that explains a lot of things. If you are interested you should watch it. It is kind of long. But it is all about how the us government staged the attacks... A Must See.... Good Luck.
If for some reason it won't load up, go to Google, Videos, and type in
"Loose Change"
2006-12-10 06:32:05 · answer #1 · answered by Korbyn's Mama 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Of course. The plan was to blow up all of New York, and most of New Jersey. Bush was trying to beat Roosevelt when he blew up all of Pearl Harbor.
Clinton had it a little tougher. He had to sneak around blowing up embassies. They were scattered out, and made the job a little more difficult.
How did you like that one when the president snuck into England and blew up the sub-ways ? Everybody thought he was at Camp David sleeping - - - pretty sneaky.
In Spain everybody was fooled by his disguise when he blew up the train. They thought it was done by Arabs. The Arabs get the blame for the killings in Iraq. What dopes, it's the president with a dirty rag on his head and a fake beard. He does his dirty work then sneaks back into his office as if nothing happened.
I know all of this is true because I read the funny papers every day, like you do. The news people are all full of it. The guys who write the comics get the real story out.
2006-12-10 06:49:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
According to some theories.
2006-12-10 06:29:47 · answer #3 · answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You, and everyone that even remotely can agree with that logic, has no wits about you whatsoever.
2006-12-10 08:02:42 · answer #4 · answered by whosaysdiscoisdead 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i without doubt belive so
2006-12-10 07:08:41 · answer #5 · answered by dasexyestcowindaworld 1 · 1⤊ 3⤋
My GOD , you people.
2006-12-10 06:27:44 · answer #6 · answered by tinamaries43 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋