When does burden of proof on a specific claim lie with a skeptic to said claim? Does it ever?
2006-12-10 06:21:27 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
To me it seems the skeptic is the one wanting proof, or wanting to disprove what is thought to be fact. Its up to the individual to get what they want. The burden of proof is most always on the prosecution.
2006-12-10 06:40:00 · answer #1 · answered by cementshroom13 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The burden of proof lays with the claimant when their claim is said to be based on fact (as opposed to opinion).
Trying to change my opinion? Back it up with facts, Jack - or forever hold your peace.
2006-12-10 14:31:16 · answer #2 · answered by joyfulpaints 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The burden of proof is always on the one making the negative
statement.
Thank you very much, while you're up.
2006-12-10 14:25:31 · answer #3 · answered by producer_vortex 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Usually when it is framed in the negative.
2006-12-10 14:27:30 · answer #4 · answered by Sophist 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋