http://www.Conspiracyarchive.com .freepressinternational.com........... ... ..DemocracyNow.org
2006-12-10 05:55:23 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
oh, there was fraud. Look at florida (18,000 undervotes in a national profile race, 6 times more then any other race?)
But the main thing that prevented election theft was sheer turnout. If enough people turn out, and machines start playing tricks, more people re going to see it and report it. Also, the machines may only be programmed to switch a certain number of votes. If they did switch that many votes, the exit polls would have been drastically different (like in 2004....) and it would have been easy to see it was stolen.
Another Factor is that enough people have seen the evidence that 2004 was stolen with electronic voting machines- there's even a criminal suit in Ohio. with that, and low credibility for the current congress, it would have been virtually impossible to steal this one with no one noticing.
2006-12-10 06:22:45 · answer #1 · answered by The Big Box 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
How do you know there was no fraud? Just because republicans lost does not mean there was no fraud. I find it funny democrats only claim fraud if they lose, but if they win everything worked out the way it was supposed to. There was fraud and there was proof of it. One of the best examples is the thousands of dead, illegals, and convicted felons that were still registered in Missouri on election day that the state claims they could not do anything about at that point. Of course we don't talk about those things though because they help the democrats win elections and as long as democrats win fraud doesn't exist.
2006-12-10 14:04:32 · answer #2 · answered by Wilkow Conservative 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You've got it backwards.
There was fraud with the machines.
2006-12-11 03:05:43 · answer #3 · answered by bettysdad 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋