∫[x (ln x)²]^-1 dx =
∫1/[x (ln x)²] dx =
u = ln x
du = dx/x
=>
∫1/[x (ln x)²] dx =∫1/u² dx = ∫u^-2 dx =
∫1/[x (ln x)²] dx = ∫u^-2 dx = -1/u + c
∫1/[x (ln x)²] dx = -1/u + c = -1/(ln x) + c
∫1/[x (ln x)²] dx = -1/(ln x) + c
Answer: letter (d)
₢
2006-12-10 05:52:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Luiz S 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The correct answer is
-1 / ln(x) + C
without the absolute value enclosures. And I see that Luiz already showed you how to do the integration by parts.
Check...
d/dx {-1/ln(x)} = - d/dx {1/ln(x)}
= - d/dx {ln x}^(-1)
= - (-1) (ln x)^(-2) d/dx {ln x}
= [ 1 / (ln x)^2 ] (1/x)
= [ x (ln x)^2 ]^(-1)
2006-12-10 05:53:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
let u=ln(x) then du=x^-1 dx so the integral becomes
int 1/u^2 du = -1/u +c = -1/ln(x) +c
(i forgot the square on the ln the first time and modified it this one's right)
2006-12-10 05:38:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Daniel P 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
int [dx/(x ln^2x)]
ln x = u
And dx/ x = du
int [du/u^2] = -1/u + c = - 1/lnx + C
(1/u)' = (u^-1)' = -1 u ^-2
So int (u^-2) = - 1/x
Ana
EDIT
I dont know why Doug wrote that the result is abs lnx. And Daniel solve another integral, he forgot that lnx was squared.
2006-12-10 05:40:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ilusion 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
you are attempting to combine by using factors, yet that's no longer required. in case you utilize the substitution u = e^(sin(x)), then du = cos(x) e^(sin(x)) dx and the quintessential on the right part is in simple terms ? du = u + C = e^(sin(x)) + C. As to your stated therapy, no you would be unable to write ? sin(x)cos(x)e^(sin(x))dx = ? sin(x) dx ? cos(x)e^(sin(x)) dx The quintessential of the product isn't the made from the integrals. luckily, you do no longer opt for something particular because of the fact the substitution does the trick.
2016-10-05 03:19:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
d. is the correct answer.
Note that dx/x = d Log[x], now substitute y=Log[x] and you are solving the much simpler integral dy/y^2 = -1/y.
2006-12-10 07:00:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Boehme, J 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
FWIW, I get -1/|ln(x)|+C
Doug
2006-12-10 05:40:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by doug_donaghue 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
i cant see the question properly -- what's the first symbol?
2006-12-10 05:36:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by love_happyfeet 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
no way
2006-12-10 05:35:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by Toni E 1
·
0⤊
1⤋