Should the nations of the world take it upon themselves to stop the mass killings of people by governments? Ex., Sudan, Former Yugoslavia, etc.
2006-12-10 05:13:33 · 7 answers · asked by ? 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
It is our responsibility as citizens of the world. However, this does include putting a stop to abortion as well.
2006-12-10 05:17:32 · answer #1 · answered by Daniel 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Morally speaking, yes, states should be concerned with stopping genocide, but politically speaking, states will not do so unless it is in their best interests to do so. Many people think that we did not intervene in Rwanda because of the political climate in the US following the failure in Somalia. Added to which, weaker states which commit these crimes often get off scot-free because they're aligned with more powerful states.
2006-12-10 05:27:23 · answer #2 · answered by Glen B 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
Sick of hearing "why does the United States think they are the worlds police?"
then hearing
"what is United States going to do about the genocide in Abbabooboo?"
2006-12-10 05:18:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It's the nations of the world who commit genocide, they have no interest in stopping it.
2006-12-10 05:17:38 · answer #4 · answered by gunrrobot 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.
2006-12-10 07:10:34 · answer #5 · answered by Elly 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes
2006-12-10 05:15:10 · answer #6 · answered by Ms Bleu 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Should they, yes. Will they, that's nearly impossible to say.
2006-12-10 06:12:46 · answer #7 · answered by Huey Freeman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋