http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061210/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq_us_report_2
2006-12-10 04:06:50 · 8 answers · asked by BAARAAACK 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This man was elected by the people there to run the country. If you would look at our history, it took 11 years after our war of Independence to come up with the Constitution and a form of Government that everyone agreed with. That was during a peaceful time.
Iraq has not had peace because of the Iranians and the Syrians slipping into their country. If we walk out now, without reaching a goal of self support, then we create a vacuum and Iran will slip in and control all of the middle east, to include Oil. What would $15.00 a gallon do for you?? Cause if Karzi controlled all that oil, rest assured, it would be a tool against the Infidels like the USA
2006-12-10 04:17:14 · answer #1 · answered by bigmikejones 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course he will call it dangerous. Just to educate some people who don't know anything about the Baath Party. Yes it was a party that Saddam was the leader of, but just because you were in it, didn't make you a bad guy. A lot of the time to get a desent job IE.. Teacher or Doctor, you had to be part of the Baath Party. The Iraq study group is just posting facts. Some people want to talk **** about Liberals on this? LOL The group is made of 5 republicans and 5 democrats.. Wait hold on.. They must be liberal republicans? And a lot of people who agree with Bush are brain washed on his views and probably lock their doors when the terror alert level is at yellow? Most of you probably haven't even served in the military.. Anyways.. I am not going to get into that. But I did put my life on the line.. (2 combat tour to Iraq). This Iraq problem has to be handled the Iraqi way with some help by leaving come combat advisors and a quick reaction force in Iraq for a short amount of time.
2006-12-10 12:23:02 · answer #2 · answered by Craig A 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think that Iraq is simply afraid of a change in policy. Of course they see it as dangerous. It suggests they are going to receive REAL pressure, not just lip service, to step up and get their **** together. Remember this is same guy who told us to go take a flying leap the last time Bush tried to put a timetable on them. They want it both ways - they want our military presence but then want us to stay out of their governmental decision making. The Iraq President has his own loyalties within that mess they call a country to adhere to - and those loyalties don't include taking much advice from the country who invaded them, whether it comes from Bush, a committee, or the new majority in Congress.
2006-12-10 12:31:10 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I dont really care what he thinks. If this guy could a run a country there would be no problem.
How many years do we try to give them democracy?
( yes I watched Brit Hume this morning and saw the democrat on there say the same thing and he was RIGHT)
2006-12-10 12:10:06 · answer #4 · answered by Perplexed 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
I don't understand what benefits would come if we alienate our close ally Israel and try to appease Iran/Syria.
They are the problem. More so Iran.
There will be no peace until there is a clear victor. And they have lost the will to fight
2006-12-10 12:11:00 · answer #5 · answered by John 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The ISG was formed of idiots and ****(i put in the *'s myself) suckers. No one should listen to them
2006-12-10 12:11:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
because they are afraid of the U.S. having talks with Iran and Syria..point blank ..that is the answer..
2006-12-10 12:09:17 · answer #7 · answered by Dfirefox 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
He says or must say what Dubya tells him to say.
2006-12-10 15:05:55 · answer #8 · answered by Mysterio 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋