I was taught early in school that the comma before the and was not necessary, but still okay. I sometimes will use a comma before the and, or after, to emphasize what comes after the and, as in a pause in the readers mind. But I write like I speak. Sorta like a feign jab before a hard right punch. Poetic license . Your choice. Any fish you wish. Just don't actually punch someone while they're reading though.
2006-12-10 03:53:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by For sure 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
when you are writing: brown, black, and green, you are setting off 3 different colors.
when you write brown, black and green, you are saying 2 different colors. Brown being one and black and green as in a mixed color instead of separate. The commas separate the colors. You have combined black and green as one color by not separating them with a comma.
2006-12-10 03:43:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Me2 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Either is acceptable usage. I prefer to use the additional comma for consistency and to emphasize the separation of the last two items.
If the last two items are part of a set, you can omit the final comma. For example: "You'll need the following ingredients: chicken, rice, peas and carrots."
2006-12-10 03:43:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Andrew 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unless you are writing for a publication that allows another convention, separate all items in a series-including the last two- with commas.
Although some publications omit the comma between the last two items, be aware that its omission can result in ambiguity or misreading.
2006-12-10 03:44:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Razor 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
combine distinctive the sentences for a rapid restoration. a vast birdlike shadow moved gracefully alongside the river over the wooded area of timber darkening the great field lined in thick weeds. The shadow moved alongside to the lake fed by employing the waterfall by some potential it replaced into sentient adequate to discover the hidden cave in the back of the gallons of falling water. The shadow replaced shape moving in direction of the top of the cave, gliding over the moist floor dodging thick brown trunks and green leaves as its length persevered to decrease. i think of I did in 3 sentences what you had in approximately six or seven. I additionally tried employing the define as dynamic as against static. each and every thing is linked, alive and in each and each sentence the shadow is recent, no longer merely a itemizing of our environment and the entity being secondary.
2016-12-30 05:28:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
both ways work, depending on the context of the sentence.
my teacher said that either way works, it's just that some people only accept it one way.
2006-12-10 03:43:25
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The second way is preferred, but it is acceptable to use either.
2006-12-10 03:40:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Atrocious 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
First way! You have to have that comma in there.
2006-12-10 03:46:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
either way is acceptable.
2006-12-10 03:41:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by baldisbeautiful 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
either way
2006-12-10 03:46:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Yung Jay 2
·
0⤊
0⤋