I think we should stick to are ANCIENT INDIAN CULTURE NOT THE MOD1
2006-12-10 01:44:07 · 12 answers · asked by cool dude 1 in Social Science ➔ Gender Studies
yes they kiss i have seen the movie
2006-12-10 02:21:34 · answer #1 · answered by jatin 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do you forget that India's "ancient" culture produced the world's most famous book on sex - the Kamasutra? Why do you forget other important historical sites like Khajuraho, Ajanta etc which all pay tribute to the same theme? Sex is not some "modern" disease that has affected India, it is very much a part of our culture. In the movie H & A fall in love....kisses between a couple in love are the most natural thing in the world. And it's not that they showed them kissing a lot of ppl or anything, only each other. If you don't kiss the person you love, who else are you supposed to kiss??? When you fall in love, wouldn't you kiss your partner???
2006-12-10 01:58:18 · answer #2 · answered by Peace 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think it seems unnatural thats why it is appaling bc we are tlking about the indian industry here...but think of it this way if u are concerned about indian culturre then I AM appalled that u dont have a problem with prostitution, extramarital affairs, rape--> those things happen on a normal basis in indian society and yes rape happens more in indian society than many other societes which indains consider themselves better than?
so before calling a kiss on screen sleazy consider the these factors which are part of indian culture--ARE THEY NOT A PART OF THE CULTURE IF MEASURES ARENT BEING TAKEN TO PREVENT THEM?? and dhoom wasnt the first movie with a kiss...and btw havent we long seen implied sex scenes in indian cinema....why dont we have a problem with that now?
2006-12-10 07:40:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are right. Its outrageous. What was considered a thing between a husband and wife is shown in the screens. Its the major factor which corrupts the minds of young ones,
For those who answered in supporting such things, well I would ask a simple question. Will they accept such things if it where their own sons and daughters????
2006-12-10 02:17:58 · answer #4 · answered by ENOCH RUFUS 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let them kiss. They are paid for it. They didn't kiss privately. When they are kissing, they are witnessed by the photographer, producer, the director and a host of others during the shooting of the action of kissing. Both are fully aware that they are surrounded by so many people when they are kissing. Why should you and I worry. Please be cool.
2006-12-10 05:06:13 · answer #5 · answered by SRIRANGAM G 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both are artists. All in the name of art.
2006-12-13 03:23:01 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its ain't a very passionate kiss you may see it closely from video clips at a website.
Anyways what so hoopla about the kiss? aint they first to kiss onscreen?? or is their something else burning due to the kiss(if u say it is)?
2006-12-10 02:04:44 · answer #7 · answered by FUKKAD 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
got to move in the forward direction
2006-12-11 00:14:33 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I THINK THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO KISS. FIRST HE KISSED ON THE UPPER LIP AND THEN ON THE OTHER
2006-12-10 01:57:25 · answer #9 · answered by manan p 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
your name doesnt go with your question cool dude
2006-12-10 02:15:14 · answer #10 · answered by Rahul S 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋