2006-12-09 23:26:35 · 5 answers · asked by McAtterie 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
I'm not sure,but I'm a huge fan of David Lynch.
2006-12-09 23:28:15 · answer #1 · answered by Celebrity girl 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Everything in Lynch’s universe has another side, sometimes perverse, sometimes slightly out-of-synch and quirky enough for you to notice every detail, every colour, every movement, and every sound. But his surrealism is doggedly pure and naïve even when things are at their darkest. He creates cinematic poetry that makes us see things, ordinary things, in brand new ways. His films switch tones and perspectives from make-believe fairy tale fantasies to dark dangerous alternate realities that can play with time-lines and employ dual narratives. This means it is often unsettling to watch much of his work.
Mulholland Dr. is another Lost Highway in the sense that just when the plot appears to resemble something logical Lynch seems perfectly happy to destroy it. Indeed, Mulholland Dr. could even be regarded as slightly more irritating than Lost Highway, since for the most part the first two 'acts' of the film seem to suggest that the final act pay-off might resemble something satisfactory for the audience. Anyone who thought that should know better.
Mulholland Dr. is a ferocious assault to the senses that will win as many Lynch fans as it does disgust his cynics, it’s a more enjoyable experience than Lost Highway but that isn’t saying much, as the film is still deeply unsettling and mind-boggling in its presentation.
2006-12-10 09:43:00 · answer #2 · answered by Senka M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From the reviews, I'd say Mulholland Drive was a culdesac and Lost Highway was, indeed, a highway to hell.
Feel free to educate me otherwise!...
2006-12-11 05:15:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why wouldn't it?
2006-12-10 07:48:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, not at all.
2006-12-10 07:51:07 · answer #5 · answered by beeeatnik 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋