Can you give me Emulators.that could run a RAIDEN 2 games?

Question

ive tried it on MAME but im confused on configuring it..

ive lot that game so much that ive wanted to have one in my pc instead of arcades.. can you help me have some?! or any games with that kind of shooting console.. thanks a lot!!! =)

Answer 1

If you want to make it easy and if your using windows then Use mameplus http://mameplus.emu-france.com/...

CLICK THIS TO DOWNLOAD THE ZIPPED FILE: (MAME .110) http://mameplus.emu-france.com/download/...

Unzip it in your mame folder allowing it to overwrite and merge files as needed.

Make a short cut icon of the (Mame32 v.110) and put it where you would like to open the program from.

This program will allow you to just click on the available rom/game you have avaliable to play and starts it.

If you have already removed the mame you had tried before this will install the full emulator.

You will need to then download the roms for the games you wish to play and you can get them here: http://www.dy1980.com/web/emu-mame5.htm
place rom files in the mame rom folder.

Answer 2

First things first- I think that interrupting a baseball game (or any non-political event, really) for political reasons is... well, not 'wrong', I guess it's just rude. I also feel that MLB should keep the All-Star game in Phoenix. I mean, the 1936 (?) Olympics were in NAZI BERLIN, this hardly compares (esp. since most of the law has now been overturned. I've been busy and have dial-up internet with no cable, so I haven't been able to find out the judge's reasoning). (It's interesting that the 1944 [or 1940, I forget] Olympics were scheduled in another Axis capital, Tokyo, but were cancelled.] As for the bill itself, I am split- I agree illegal immigration is a problem, and feel that this law was done for the right reasons; that is, the state leg. just wanted to solve said problem, and wasn't out to 'get' Hispanics or anything. However, even with good intentions, and racial profiling BANNED, doesn't mean it wouldn't still happen (the road to Hell is paved with Good Intentions...). Then there is the whole Constitutional aspect- it does seem to say the Fed. Gov. should do it. But this leads to the whole, 'But what if the Fed. WON'T?' which is a very interesting Const/gov. debate. Again, I'd like to see the judge's reasoning.