2006-12-09 22:43:17 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Cricket
In 38 innings (11 N.O.): 2 centuries (136 & 119 NO) & 2 fifties: Average: 35.55
136 runs: Match lost by India by 12 runs (Needed 271 to win against Pak finishded 258 all out)
119 NO: Need to score 406 (England): India finished 343/6 Match drawn
For comparison:
Lara:
46 innings (5 NO): 2 centuries 7 fifties 7 ducks 35.12 average
153 runs: WI won by 1 wkt
122 runs: Australia won by 118 runs
Ponting:
32 innings (13 NO) 4 centuries 3 fifties 3 ducks 59.57 average
156 runs: Match drawn
143* runs: Australia won by 8 wkts
118* runs: Australia won by 3 wkts
100* runs: Australia won by 4 wkts
Interesting figures.
2006-12-13 22:01:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Criteria ↓Mat ↓ Runs ↓HS ↓ BatAv ↓100 ↓ 50 ↓ W ↓ BB ↓ Ct ↓
overall132 10469 248* 55.39 35 41 37 3/10 82
v Australia211859 241*53.1177113/3112
v Bangladesh3 302 248* 151.001 02 1/27 2
v England191766 19367.9268 11/27 15
v New Zealand 161062217 48.273 5 5 2/7 8
v Pakistan16 918194*39.91 25 92/35 8
v South Africa 16 1003169 37.14 33 5 3/10 10
v Sri Lanka16 131314869.10 7 3 0- 8
v West Indies 161328179 57.73 372 2/107 14
v Zimbabwe9 918 201*76.50 3 3 2 1/19 5
in Australia 12 1029241* 54.154 3 7 2/10 8
in Bangladesh 3 302248*151.00 1 0 2 1/27 2
in England101074193 71.60 4 4 0 - 6
in India60 4917 217 55.24 16 19 15 3/10 39
in New Zealand 8 49811341.50 1 34 2/7 3
in Pakistan10 483194* 40.25 1 24 2/36 6
in South Africa 9 63616942.40 3 1 2 1/9 7
in Sri Lanka6 670143 111.66 4 2 0 - 4
in West Indies 10 620 117 47.69 1 5 2 2/107 7
in Zimbabwe4 240 7440.00 0 211/190
as captain25 2054 217 51.35 7 7 43/10 16
not as captain 107 8415 248* 56.472834 33 3/3166
toss won72 6400248*64.00 21 23203/10 49
toss lost60 4069 176 45.71 14 18 17 3/31 33
toss won & batted48 4904 241* 71.07 17 17133/10 28
toss won & fielded24 1496 248* 48.25 4 67 2/10 21
toss lost & sent in 14 1206 155 48.24 5 6 3 2/107 6
toss lost & fielded 46 2863176 44.73 9 12 14 3/31 27
matches batting 1st 626110241* 65.0022 2316 3/1034
matches fielding 1st 704359248* 45.8813 18 21 3/31 48
1st team innings1327464248*60.6826 2822 3/10 47
2nd team innings 119 3005176 45.53 9 13 153/31 35
1st match innings 132 4091241*70.53 15 12 9 2/10 27
2nd match innings 129 3373248*51.89 11 16 133/10 20
3rd match innings 119 2045176 52.43 7 11 102/30 28
4th match innings 83 960136 35.55 2 2 5 3/31 7
matches won41 3464 248*64.14 12 12 113/31 28
matches drawn 54 4363 241* 71.52 1520 82/30 29
matches lost 37 2642177 35.70 8 9 18 3/1025
won by an innings 151522 248*117.07 6 4 4 2/36 10
won defending target12 1059 155* 48.13 4 5 3 3/31 9
won chasing target 14 883 126 46.47 2 3 4 2/36 9
lost by an innings 2 9045 22.50 0 0 1 1/34 2
lost defending targ. 19 1263 169 33.23 4 4 7 2/10 14
lost chasing target 161289 177 40.28 4 5 10 3/10 9
1st/Only Tests47 3304248* 54.16 111210 3/10 23
2nd Tests413530201* 56.9313 14 133/3133
3rd Tests312517217 51.368 7 92/30 20
4th Tests8 603241* 67.00 1 5 4 2/105
5th Tests3 329 114 65.80 1 2 0 -1
in series drawn 34 2723241* 52.36 7 13 9 2/35 16
in series lost 50 3525177 45.19 12 16 16 3/10 34
in series won 48 4221248* 71.54 16 12 12 3/31 32
1
2006-12-10 01:45:00 · answer #2 · answered by jigsaw86 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
He has in fact scored 2 100s in the 4th innings of Tests.
1. England v India, 1990, 2nd Test. Manchester
India was set a target of 408 in 90 overs, match was drawn
SR Tendulkar not out 119
2. Pakistan in India, 1998/99, 1st Test. Chennai
India was set a target of 271
Result: Pakistan won by 12 runs
SR Tendulkar c W Akram b Saqlain Mushtaq 136
So 2 100s, 0 wins.
2006-12-10 08:03:01 · answer #3 · answered by backpacka 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Tendulkar has only scored a hundred twice while batting in the 4th innings and none of them is in winning cause. One of them is a draw and the other is in losing case against Pakistan at Chennai in year 1998. By the time he was out, I think he had done his job quite brilliantly. Had India won the match, the Innings from him would have been rated as one of the greatest innings of all time in Tests. Ir-respect of what happened in the match, I think it was his best innings in Test cricket.
Rawal.
2006-12-10 03:46:00 · answer #4 · answered by Tony 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
no longer so confident with regard to the Pakistan bit :) yet definite India have a great checklist in India! If Pakistan can defeat or a minimum of draw with England then, i think, they could defeat India in England with their %. attack (even with India's extra special batting capability). we could wait and spot what happens! by employing the way Waugh could desire to be a enormously user-friendly and brave guy to declare those issues in India!
2016-12-30 05:21:24 · answer #5 · answered by levatt 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
.................. tendulkar and gavasker between them must have won only ................. 4 to 5 test matches ....................... they always played and made runs to a lost match when opposition had no interest in the match anymore ................ as it was already lost by the indian team ............... check this out for yourself before you get any ideas ......
2006-12-10 03:30:52 · answer #6 · answered by spaceman 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
good question. plz refer the question to the selectors. i feel tendulkar is a very good player under limited circumstances but his mental toughness is wanting under trying conditions. can this record of his be compared with venkatesh prasad?
2006-12-09 23:01:56 · answer #7 · answered by ajitav 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The answer is simple and easy. ZERO
2006-12-10 01:31:59 · answer #8 · answered by atlantindian 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
HARDLY ANY
AND ALL OF THEM IN DRAWN MATCHES
2006-12-13 16:48:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
MANY
2006-12-10 23:56:09 · answer #10 · answered by greatmangentletrue 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋