harsh punishiment for criminals is the best way to prevent crime or not?

Question

harsh punishiment for criminals is the best way to prevent crime or not?
any quotations about it ?
thanks

Answer 1

While I do agree that harsh and consistent punishment is important, I also think an effective strategy for dealing with crime is to stop it at its source. I beleive that a significant amount of crime is caused by poverty and lack of education and opportunity. If fewer people reach the point where they feel like they have to rob a liquor store or break into someone's house to make a buck then there will be less crime.

Answer 2

It seems logical that a harsh penalty would deter a criminal. However, that's not what the statistics show. The US has one of the highest crime rates in the world, and yet we also have some of the harshest penalties.

I think most criminals aren't actually thinking "gee, since its only life in jail instead of the death penalty, I think I'll go ahead and commit that murder I've been thinking about." Violent criminals are usually pretty disturbed people, and aren't thinking about the consequences of their actions or what may happen to them.

Then there's the question of victimless crime. Is a long jail sentence really an appropriate penalty for a heroin addict that commited no other crimes other than his use of a controlled substance? I don't think that's the time to be harsh. Jail doesn't cure addiction, its just makes that person more likely to become an actual hardened criminal.

Answer 3

I think that if you make the punishment harsh and known and enforced, it might make the young criminals think twice before committing them. But the court system can't just give the perpetrator a slap on the wrist and let them go. They'll need jail time. As silly as it may sound, theft should have jail time as long as a month even if it is a child and a dollar item. If one of my children was caught stealing, I would make him or her take their sentencing to ensure this fear of "this is what will happen if I steal"
I love my kids but I believe in making them understand that if you break the law you will be punished. This type of love is good for their own safety. Just taking them home and put under house arrest just doesn't work as well as juvenile hall. If you are going to teach a child about life it's best to do it the right way through love and strict discipline. However, I never hit my children. Confinement to a certain place and doing chores works every time,I love them enough to change their behavior to good behavior and respect other people.

Answer 4

Depends on what you mean as harsh. If a crime is committed there must be punishment and there should be some form of restitution for the victim.

Punishment is just that. It isn't going to be a general deterrent to keeping criminals from committing crimes.

The only punishment that would prevent crimes is the death penalty, because once a criminal is dead there is no chance for escape or harming anyone else.

Answer 5

How about this, after the 3rd felony conviction or 6th misdemeanor the criminal killed. It'll deter people from commiting crimes, lighten the load on the court system for the habitual screw-ups, lighten the load on the prison systems, and lighten the load on the tax-payers. Everyone wins except the criminals and the lawyers. Some of the money saved can be devoted to programs to try to rehabilitate the criminals before it's too late.

Answer 6

ideas-blowing element. Wrongful conviction is by employing some distance the main compelling reason to oppose capital punishment. even with the undeniable fact that, there are various,many others: - fee - by using criminal equipment designed to decrease wrongful executions (and the great cost of dying row incarceration), it expenses taxpayers plenty extra to execute somebody than to imprison them for existence. - it is not a deterrent - violent crime expenses are continually greater in dying penalty jurisdictions. - that's unevenly and arbitrarily utilized. - by using fact the U.S. is between the final last international locations with capital punishment, many different international locations refuse to extradite properly-known criminals who could be status trial right here. - It fosters a fashion of existence of violence by employing affirming that killing is an appropriate answer to a situation. - Jesus replaced into against it (see Matthew 5:7 & 5:38-39, James 4:12, Romans 12:17-21, John 8:7, and James a million:20). - existence with out parole (LWOP) is on the books in maximum states now (all different than Alaska), and it potential what it says. people who get this sentence are taken off the streets. For solid. - As Voltaire as quickly as wrote, "enable the punishments of criminals be sensible. A hanged guy is solid for no longer something; a guy condemned to public works nevertheless serves the country, and is a residing lesson."

Answer 7

Yes, and you can rest assured that the reason crime is so high is because of the coddling promoted by liberals.

If I were suddenly to become in charge of the country, I GUARANTEE that the crime would drop by 90 per cent. My punishments would be so severe that the shock value would prevent it, for certain. The screams would be ringing in people's ears, and I'd make sure of that. A new, heightened state of awareness would exist.

Liberals are very dangerous - then allow and enable evil to flourish in many areas.

Answer 8

The punishment should fit the crime. If you wrongfully kill someone you get the death penalty. If you inure someone while robbing them you get a little canning to go along with jail time, causing pain brings you pain. The canning is administered by the victim or someone the victims chooses, and you must repay your victim and pay for your own incarceration. If you are a white collar thief that steals from your employees you forfeit your assets, the thing these greedy types covet the most in life, and you get a little canning to go along with jail time and you must repay your victims, from the proceeds of your seized assets, and pay for your own incarceration.

Answer 9

I believe the punishment should fit the crime. An eye for and eye and a tooth for a tooth.
I also believe in the death penalty, not for every murder but only after the motive has been very carefully examined.

Answer 10

I spent the first 15 years of my life being horribly abused by a man who went to prison for a year before he married my mother. I have always believed that his harsh treatment while in prison was what led him to be the sadistic torturer that he was. Abuse of prisoners leads to abuse of innocent people once those abused prisoners are released.