It's a red herring to distract from Bush's performance. As it becomes crystal clear that Bush led America into an unjust and unnecessary war, and is thus responsible for the deaths of many, Republicans have stepped up their claim that Clinton murdered 50 or more people to cover up his extra marital affairs. Google this absurdity, if you don't believe me.
On the topic of worst president, check these articles by historians from last week's Washington Post. Bush was reportedly furious when he heard about them. Expect a lot of right wing media attacks on the Washington Post now.
2006-12-10 23:46:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Red Herring 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
There will always be bashing it doesn't matter who the president is as long as the views are not close to the person doing the bashing.
How does it look when the president of the country takes an oath to tell the truth the whole truth and nothing but the truth and lies. Reguardless of what the question was he lied under oath. He is the president he is suppose to set example for the rest of the country. An oath that involved the Judical system an office that he is in charge. That's like the head of the church preaching and not practicing what he preaches. You still have the blind followers who will go the 10 yards with him. Then you have his followers that wake up and say hey what's this do as I say and not as I do.
If you truly want a democrat President in 08 then vote for someone else. As nice as it would be to have a woman president there is still to much racism. Some people just don't like her other people will vote against her because she is a woman.
Don't get me wrong I love Clinton. I am one of the blind followers. What they did to him was nothing less then a witch hunt. He was made to take an oath and answer question about his sex life. Which honestly was not any of the American populution business. However Bush and Chenny both refused to take an oath reguarding the 9/11 attack. What make one president better then that other?
2006-12-09 20:54:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by wondermom 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
did no longer "Glass-Steagall Act of 1933" get repealed on the behest of the Republican occasion? you know the adult men that controlled Clinton's Congress. those with the chant of "Deregulation" for each thing. Clinton might have Vetoed it and particular been overridden. Phil Gramm strike a chord? The REPUBLICAN that have been given a huge money interest with UBS? a huge money economic employer. all and sundry beside me see a trend? If human beings decide for to place blame on somebody for at present's mess then permit's do it and dance. What the hell did Bush do for 8 finished years to counter his pal Phil? He had a Republican congress for 6 of them, He replaced into extra effective than keen to sign something they handed. The Democrats had a soft majority for 2 years and not sufficient votes to counter a veto from Republican Bush. And veto he did. something and each thing Democratic he vetoed. And extra significant Republicans saved pushing for deregulation and deregulation even Sara Palin stated over the final election: "the terrific factor government can do is get out of employer way" that's deregulation!!! nicely it did and we've been given the economic mess. So back what did Bush and employer do? Why are Republicans complaining besides. They have been given precisely what they needed and voted for. Gramm have been given his enormous dollar interest, we've been given the shaft and abortions are stilll legal.
2016-10-14 09:30:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by croes 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it has something to do with the fact that they told Clinton that raising the minimum wage was going to cause unemployment to rise and businesses will be going bankrupt left and right. The opposite happened, unemployment went down and the economy took off like a rocket and ever since then they have been trying to paint Clinton in a bad picture.
2006-12-09 23:43:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I agree with every word you said ... except the order of your list.
I would have put Reagan as #2 ... because of the mess he made getting us in such debt, deregulating the savings banks (which we are still paying for because of all the defauts), and weakening the unions when he fired all the air traffic controllers ... not to mention the whole Iran-Contra mess ... bombs for oil etc. He makes Nixon look like a disruptive kindergardner compared to the vast changes in this country that Reagan made.
Not only is Bush the worst president ... he is changing this country in ways that are very scary. (please watch the attached video).
Now as far as Hillary and Pelosi ...
Hillary is hated more than her hubby ... he was the smartest pres we ever had, and she's probably smarter than him ... so they give her a lot of bad press in hopes that people will hate her ... and sadly because people generally only listen to soundbites and not really go into depth about who the person really is and what they stand for. I don't think she has a chance.
I'm disappointed that Pelosi took impeachment off the table ... other than that I think she's terrific ... but let's see how she runs things once she has the power in January.
I like Barack Obama ... but he's too green yet, not enough experience in Washington. Maybe in 2012? He was elected president of the Law Review at Harvard.... the 1st black to have that position and probably one of the few Democrats also to get that job. And the reason was: he was able to mediate extreme opposite sides and have them come to agreements. That is a skill all presidents should have!
I love to hear him speak ... his words always ring with truth as clear as a bell.
But first things first ... we've got to get outta Iraq and get rid of this Pres and his entourage.
We've got to change the voting system so it is accountable, with paper ballots. Corporations should 'pay' for elections ... they should be federally funded. I could go on and on about that.
But suffice it to say ...
WE NEED A CHANGE AND WE NEED IT NOW!
Two more year of this dolt and we're done for!
2006-12-09 21:10:19
·
answer #5
·
answered by GRNeyzNYC 3
·
5⤊
1⤋
Clinton is responsible for most of the problems that plague us today and I think you're wrong on a whole lot of other points:
Carter was the worst president I've seen. Aside from being incompetent, he and his drunk brother made us they laughingstock of the world. Two no-talent, anti-semetic rednecks
Bush didn't lie and almost every Democrat on the hill was saying the exact same things (you must have a very short memory). They were operating on the information available.
He's not a killer like Bin laden. That assertion is ludacris.
What innocent Iraqi citizens were bombed? Give me a single reference. When we invaded, leaflets were dropped warning them we were coming. Can you do nothing but lie?
Bush did not kill 3,000 Americans
the economy is more robust now than it has been in years.
Like I said, Clinton was an indicted criminal who had his license to practice law stripped away foe lying to a Grand Jury. How great is that genius?
We were not safe under Clinton. Americans were being murdered around the globe and at home because Billybob was so busy chasing skirts that he didn't have time to do his job.
You can have Hillary and nancy. I hope you do a threesome with those two pigs.
Your points are weak and unsubstantiated. Your just another loopy lefty bigot who can't think straight.
2006-12-09 23:33:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
5⤋
I think that you're absolutely correct! However I think that you kinda over simplified things, and make them to blatant for the Conservatives to accept, and that is where you may find trouble. Bush's record is failure compared to Clinton's! There is very little to applaud Bush for during his terms in Office throughout his entire political career. He has not been held accountable nor responsible by his constituency, that at times has also found it hard to accept this man's actions and perspectives on the critical affairs of the Country...
2006-12-10 01:15:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by The Idealist 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's unfortunate. Apparently, they don't like the idea of accountability. Clinton was hardly perfect, but Bush has made his fair share of mistakes as well which have been far more devastating. There's nothing wrong with wanting accountability. There's something definitely wrong with not being able to accept responsibility.
2006-12-09 21:10:50
·
answer #8
·
answered by Shotten 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
Who is the worst president in US history, Penis Clinton or GW Bullshit? It is a difficult question (though I think penis Clinton is the worst). Both sent US soldiers to wars on lies, both are worse then Osama Bush Laden (or whatever), both ordered bombs to be dropped on innocent civilians, so that a few of their supporters could make billions of dollars, after they blew other countries up and rebuilt it. The situation of the US economy or the number of its military deaths is as "relevant" as the situation of Nazi Germany's economy and its military deaths. Nixon was one of the greatest US presidents. And Hitlery Clinton doesn't use deodorant-yuck!!!
2006-12-09 20:50:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Avner Eliyahu R 6
·
0⤊
4⤋
I agree 100% with your thesis. Clinton was one of the best, if not THE best president we ever had. His proclivity towards "recreation" in the White House is the only Democratic negative those bitter Republican losers can light on. I, personally, think that most of them are jealous of Clinton because he could get a BJ and they can't.
2006-12-09 22:01:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋